Law

Borderlines, Benchslaps, and Burdens of Proof

by

The legal landscape surrounding immigration, federal authority, and the interpretation of statutes continues to evolve, particularly in light of recent Supreme Court cases. The discussions surrounding these cases often highlight the delicate balance between state and federal powers, as well as the implications of judicial interpretations on policy and individual rights. Understanding these nuances is essential for comprehending how borderlines, both literal and figurative, shape the legal framework within which these cases operate. Borderlines in Immigration Law The Immigration and Nationality Act stipulates that an alien who “arrives in the United States” can apply for … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Wednesday, November 12

by

On November 12, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is poised to address several significant cases and issues that have caught the attention of legal scholars and the public alike. This date marks a continuation of the court’s busy schedule, as it deliberates on matters that could have far-reaching implications for American law and society. The court’s decisions not only shape the legal landscape but also reflect the evolving values and priorities of the nation. Key Developments in SCOTUS One of the notable aspects of the court’s current session is its consideration of … Read more

The Justices to Consider Compassionate-Release Statute

by

The Supreme Court is set to deliberate on significant issues surrounding the compassionate-release statute, a crucial legal framework that governs the potential for federal prisoners to seek sentence reductions. This statute, codified as 18 U.S.C. ยง 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), was established under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. It allows for the modification of a prisoner’s sentence when they demonstrate “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that warrant such a change, subject to criteria established by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Overview of the Upcoming Cases On November 12, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in two pivotal cases: Fernandez … Read more

Justices Agree to Decide Major Election Law Case

by

In a pivotal moment for election law, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case that could redefine the parameters of ballot counting in federal elections. This case, known as Watson v. Republican National Committee, stems from a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day. The implications of this ruling could resonate across the United States, as similar laws exist in over 30 states and the District of Columbia. Background of the Case The dispute traces back … Read more