Laws

How deferential is the Roberts court to presidential power?

by

The relationship between the Supreme Court and presidential power has been a focal point of constitutional debate, particularly during the tenure of the Roberts Court. Scholars and commentators alike have expressed concerns about the extent to which the Court defers to executive authority, especially in light of actions taken during the Trump administration. This complex dynamic raises critical questions about the balance of power among the branches of government and the implications for democracy and the rule of law. Understanding the Roberts Court’s Approach to Presidential Power Recent analyses suggest that the Roberts Court may … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, December 23

by

On December 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) continues its tradition of providing updates on significant legal matters, particularly as the holiday season approaches. This edition of SCOTUStoday highlights key developments and ongoing discussions within the Court, which is currently navigating complex issues ranging from birthright citizenship to redistricting. As the Court prepares for a brief hiatus during the holidays, legal enthusiasts and scholars alike are keenly observing the implications of these cases. Holiday Traditions at the Supreme Court The Supreme Court Building has a long-standing tradition of celebrating the holiday … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Monday, December 15

by

As the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) approaches the midpoint of December, legal observers are keenly interested in the developments surrounding the Court’s activities. With the Bill of Rights being ratified on this day in 1791, the significance of the Constitution’s first ten amendments remains a focal point of legal discourse. This historical context underscores the ongoing relevance of the Supreme Court’s decisions as they shape contemporary legal landscapes. Current Activities and Anticipations The Supreme Court’s December calendar currently shows no scheduled arguments or conferences after the morning’s order list release. This absence … Read more

When rules of statutory interpretation change midstream

by

The evolution of statutory interpretation has significant implications for the judicial process, particularly as courts navigate complex legislative frameworks. Recent cases, such as FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., illustrate the shifting methodologies that courts employ in interpreting statutes. This transition from a purposivist approach, which emphasized congressional intent, to a textualist framework that prioritizes the literal text of the law marks a notable change in legal practice. Shifts in Methodology: From Purposivism to Textualism Historically, courts often adopted a purposivist stance, where the intent and objectives behind legislation were paramount … Read more