Philips

Exploring the Complexity of Mass Tort Litigations: Insights from Camp Lejeune, AFFF Foam, and Philips CPAP Cases

by

Mass tort litigation, representing clusters of lawsuits involving numerous plaintiffs against one or a few defendants, is currently highlighting significant legal battles across the United States. Unlike class-action lawsuits that consolidate filings under one representative, mass torts require each plaintiff to individually demonstrate harm. This complex arena features prominent cases such as the Camp Lejeune water contamination, AFFF firefighting foam, and the Philips CPAP machine recalls. These cases demonstrate the intricate nature of mass torts where the specifics of each claim are as critical as the overarching allegations. For instance, the Camp Lejeune litigation focuses … Read more

Fuel Feud Finale? Kobre & Kim Seeks $1.2 Billion in Damages, Higher Interest Against Philips 66 for Trade Secret Misuse

by

OAKLAND, Calif. — A recent court proceedings have escalated as Kobre & Kim LLP, a law firm representing Propel Fuels, filed a motion in the Alameda County Superior Court to enhance a jury verdict against energy company Phillips 66. The law firm is seeking to increase the damages awarded to Propel Fuels to $1.2 billion and is asking for the application of a 10% interest rate on post-judgment amounts. The legal dispute centers on allegations that Phillips 66 misused proprietary information from Propel Fuels, a company that specializes in renewable fuels. Two months prior, a … Read more

Philips Takes Legal Action Against U.S. Laboratory Following Device Recall Controversy

by

Amsterdam, Netherlands — Global tech giant Philips initiated legal action against a prominent U.S. laboratory, accusing it of improperly handling interactions around a massive recall of Philips sleep apnea devices, the company announced Tuesday. The lawsuit, filed in a federal court, stems from a contentious dispute over the recall process and seeks reparatory damages that the company claims resulted from mismanagement by the lab. At the heart of the lawsuit is Philips’ claim that the laboratory failed to meet the compliance and regulatory standards necessary during the recall, which involved millions of sleep therapy devices … Read more