Precedent

Pennsylvania Courts Create Precedent with $175 Million Verdict Against Monsanto in Roundup Litigation

by

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania—In a significant legal ruling, judges in Pennsylvania have established a split between federal and state courts related to a major $175 million verdict against Monsanto. This case, part of the ongoing litigation concerning the herbicide Roundup, marks a pivotal moment in the legal landscape for agricultural products. The decision arises from a mass tort situation in Philadelphia, where a jury had previously delivered a substantial verdict to plaintiffs claiming that Roundup caused health issues. The outcome has broader implications, as it highlights the diverging interpretations of laws at different judicial levels in regard … Read more

Pennsylvania Courts Set Precedent in Monsanto Roundup Case with $175 Million Verdict Split

by

PHILADELPHIA — In a significant development for the legal landscape, Pennsylvania judges have created a split between federal and state courts over a $175 million verdict linked to Monsanto in the Roundup mass tort case during the first half of 2025. This ruling contributes to the complicated narrative surrounding glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, which has faced scrutiny for its alleged health risks. The verdict, which emerged from Philadelphia’s court system, has sparked discussions among legal experts regarding the implications of the bifurcation within the judicial system. This division raises questions about jurisdiction and … Read more

Texas Appeals Court Nullifies $750,000 Payout to Disabled Worker, Citing Key Legal Precedent

by

AUSTIN, Texas — A Texas appeals court has reversed a jury’s decision to award $750,000 to a permanently disabled worker, citing a key legal precedent that limits such claims. The 11th District Court of Appeals determined that Donald Bristow’s allegations against Sentry Insurance, which included bad faith practices, were not valid under the current interpretation of state law. The court’s ruling, issued on Wednesday, was influenced by a significant 2012 decision from the Texas Supreme Court in Ruttiger. The justices clarified that claims related to the Texas Insurance Code and the implied duty of good … Read more

4th Circuit Upholds Employer’s Right in COVID Vaccine Exemption Case, Setting Legal Precedent

by

RICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court’s decision favorable to an employer in a legal challenge regarding religious exemptions to COVID-19 vaccination mandates. The ruling, issued by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, affects a case involving a group of employees at a Virginia company who sought exemptions from the company’s vaccination policy due to their religious beliefs. The decision stemmed from a lawsuit filed by employees claiming the company’s mandatory vaccination policy infringed on their rights to practice their religion. The employees argued that the vaccine conflicted with their … Read more