Historic Appeal: UK’s First Openly Transgender Judge Fights Supreme Court Ruling at European Court of Human Rights

Strasbourg, France — Dr. Victoria McCloud, recognized as the first openly transgender judge in the UK, has appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) following a controversial ruling by the UK Supreme Court. The Supreme Court defined the terms “woman” and “sex” under the Equality Act 2010 strictly by biological criteria, effectively excluding transgender women who hold Gender Recognition Certificates. The appeal, brought forth by the Trans Legal Clinic in collaboration with W-Legal, references Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. McCloud argues that her exclusion from the case violates her … Read more

Groundbreaking Legal Challenge: UK’s First Transgender Judge Fights Supreme Court Ruling in European Human Rights Court

London, England — The UK’s first transgender judge has taken legal action against the UK government, contesting a recent Supreme Court ruling concerning the legal definition of biological sex. Victoria McCloud, a retired judge now working as a litigation strategist with W-Legal, argues that the court’s decision compromised her rights to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. McCloud is seeking a rehearing on the matter, claiming that the Supreme Court’s refusal to consider her representation, as well as evidence from other transgender individuals and groups, denied her a … Read more

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Transgender Rights: Tennessee’s Ban on Gender-Affirming Care Upheld in Controversial Decision

Washington, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has charted new territory regarding the equal protection principles as they relate to transgender individuals in its recent decision on a Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for minors. In the case of United States v. Skrmetti, the Court’s conservative majority upheld the law, marking a pivotal moment for transgender rights and the future of sex discrimination laws. The ruling centers on how constitutional standards should be applied to laws discriminating against transgender individuals. LGBTQ+ advocates had hoped the Court would adopt a more stringent review standard. Instead, … Read more

Supreme Court’s Controversial Ruling on Transgender Health Care Sparks Debate Over Equal Protection Standards

Nashville, Tennessee — The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in United States v. Skrmetti has sparked discussions over its adherence to the Equal Protection Clause, particularly regarding classifications tied to identity. Critics argue that the Court is straying from its own anti-classification doctrine, which mandates careful scrutiny of government actions based on classifications of race, sex, and national origin. Historically, the Supreme Court has insisted that any government classification related to these identities must undergo rigorous examination. This scrutiny aims to ensure that such measures serve compelling governmental interests and that there are no feasible … Read more