publiclawlibrary.org

Morrison v. Olson and the Triumph of the Unitary Executive Theory

by

The Supreme Court case of Morrison v. Olson stands as a pivotal moment in the discussion surrounding the unitary executive theory, a concept that posits the president’s absolute authority over the executive branch of government. This case, decided in 1988, highlighted the tension between presidential power and the checks and balances inherent in the U.S. Constitution. The ruling, which was overwhelmingly in favor of limiting presidential authority, has since been revisited in contemporary discussions, particularly as the political landscape evolves and the composition of the Court changes. The Unitary Executive Theory: Origins and Implications The … Read more

Morrison v. Olson and the Triumph of the Unitary Executive Theory

by

The case of Morrison v. Olson serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate surrounding the unitary executive theory, a concept that has gained renewed attention in recent years. This theory posits that the president holds comprehensive authority over the executive branch of the government, which includes the power to appoint and dismiss key agency officials without congressional interference. The implications of this theory extend beyond mere constitutional interpretation; they touch upon the very fabric of the separation of powers that underpins the American political system. The Historical Context of Morrison v. Olson Decided … Read more

Trump v. Slaughter: An Explainer

by

The case of Trump v. Slaughter represents a significant legal battle concerning the limits of presidential power and the structure of independent federal agencies. At the heart of this dispute is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), an agency whose operational independence is being challenged. This case raises important questions about the balance of power within the U.S. government, particularly regarding the president’s authority over independent agencies. The Federal Trade Commission and Its Role Established in 1914 during President Woodrow Wilson’s administration, the FTC was designed to protect consumers from unfair business practices and to promote … Read more

Court appears sympathetic to faith-based pregnancy centers’ argument

by

The Supreme Court’s recent deliberations have highlighted a growing tension between state regulations and the rights of faith-based organizations. In a notable case, the Court showed signs of sympathy toward faith-based pregnancy centers challenging New Jersey’s demand for disclosure regarding their fundraising practices. This legal battle underscores the complexities surrounding First Amendment rights and the state’s interest in regulating nonprofit organizations. Background of the Case The legal confrontation began when New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin issued subpoenas to First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a faith-based nonprofit. These subpoenas sought information about the organization’s donors … Read more