December Docket Dash: Twenty New Likely Relists on Seven Issues

The Supreme Court is currently navigating a busy docket as it approaches the mid-January deadline for filling out its argument calendar. Among the cases under consideration, a notable trend has emerged involving relisted petitions, particularly those that challenge significant legal issues. This December, twenty new cases are anticipated to be relisted for further examination, reflecting the court’s ongoing engagement with complex legal questions that impact various facets of law and society. Understanding Relists and Their Importance Relists occur when the Supreme Court decides to postpone a decision on a certiorari petition, essentially placing it back … Read more

Out of the Shadows: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket

The Supreme Court of the United States often operates in the public eye, making landmark decisions that shape the legal landscape. However, a significant aspect of its work occurs behind the scenes, known as the “shadow docket.” This term refers to the court’s handling of emergency requests and other matters that do not follow the traditional path of full briefing and oral argument. As this area of the court’s function gains traction in public discourse, it is imperative to understand the mechanisms and implications of the shadow docket. What Constitutes the Shadow Docket? The shadow … Read more

Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration’s Request in Immigration Judges Dispute

The Supreme Court’s recent decision not to entertain a request from the Trump administration marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal battles surrounding immigration judges. This ruling stems from a broader dispute regarding a policy that limits the ability of immigration judges to engage in speaking activities concerning their roles and the agency that oversees them. The implications of this ruling could have lasting effects on the autonomy of immigration judges and the operational dynamics within the judicial immigration framework. Background of the Dispute At the heart of the dispute is a policy enforced … Read more

supreme advocacy: supreme on style, a bit light on substance

The documentary titled “Supreme Advocacy: What It Takes to Argue at the Supreme Court,” directed by Andrew Satter, presents a captivating yet somewhat superficial look into the life of a Supreme Court litigator. It follows Roman Martinez, a partner at Latham & Watkins, as he prepares for and argues the case of A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools. This case revolves around the educational accommodations for a teenage girl with severe epilepsy, challenging the existing federal disability discrimination laws. While the film does well in showcasing the advocacy process, it may leave viewers wanting more depth … Read more