Bias

Retired Judge Peter Cahill Reflects on Derek Chauvin Trial: Bias, Hate Mail, and Legacy

by

MINNEAPOLIS — As Derek Chauvin’s trial for the murder of George Floyd remains a pivotal moment in American law and society, Judge Peter Cahill reflects on the intense experience that defined his tenure. In a recent interview, the retired judge discussed the multifaceted challenges of presiding over the high-profile case that captivated national attention. Cahill, who is 66 years old, admitted to facing personal biases as he approached the trial, stating, “Part of my training is to check my bias.” He acknowledged a pro-police perspective, influenced by family ties in law enforcement, and noted the … Read more

US Judge Reflects on Impact of Gender Bias Concerns Following Advocacy for Female Lawyers

by

A U.S. district judge has expressed regret over a recent decision that has raised concerns about bias after advocating for female attorneys in a high-profile case. The judge, who presides in a jurisdiction facing scrutiny for gender representation, acknowledged the implications of her remarks during a court session that called attention to the need for more women in the legal profession. In a statement, the judge emphasized her intentions to promote diversity and inclusion within the legal field. However, her comments have sparked a debate about whether encouraging female lawyers may inadvertently suggest that male … Read more

Colorado Court Upholds Jury Verdict, Rejects Claims of Anti-Police Bias During Civil Trial

by

Colorado’s Court of Appeals has ruled that claims surrounding a juror’s anti-police remarks during a civil trial do not warrant a new trial, reaffirming the limitations on what jurors can be questioned about post-deliberations. Typically, jurors are protected from testifying about their internal discussions, although exceptions exist for instances of improper outside influence or severe bias. The appellate panel clarified that the constitutional exception recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court, which addresses extreme biases affecting trial integrity, does not extend to anti-police sentiments. In a decision rendered on May 1, a three-judge panel determined that … Read more

Judge Set to Decide on Bias Allegations in Menendez Brothers’ Sentencing Appeal as Evidence Assessment Looms

by

Los Angeles, California — A ruling is anticipated Friday that could significantly impact the future of Erik and Lyle Menendez, the brothers serving life sentences for the 1989 murders of their parents. The Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic will address motions to remove the district attorney from the case, following allegations of bias by the defense team. Additionally, the judge will consider whether a risk assessment could be introduced as evidence at the brothers’ resentencing hearing. This risk assessment, conducted by prison and parole officials, evaluates the potential danger the Menendez brothers … Read more