Case

Court appears divided on whether lower courts properly found death row inmate to be intellectually disabled

by

The Supreme Court recently grappled with the complex case of Joseph Smith, an Alabama man who has spent over two decades on death row. The core issue at hand is whether the lower courts adequately assessed Smith’s assertion of intellectual disability, which is critical in determining his eligibility for execution. Smith’s situation is particularly challenging due to the fact that he has undergone five separate IQ tests over nearly four decades, yielding varying results that complicate the legal proceedings surrounding his death sentence. Background of the Case Smith’s legal battle is rooted in the Supreme … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Wednesday, December 10

by

On this day, December 10, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will deliberate on significant legal matters that touch upon crucial constitutional principles. One of the notable cases on the docket is Hamm v. Smith, which revisits the implications of the landmark decision in Atkins v. Virginia. This case is pivotal as it addresses the intersection of intellectual disability and capital punishment in the context of constitutional protections against cruel and unusual punishment. Overview of Hamm v. Smith The case of Hamm v. Smith will explore certain aspects of the Supreme Court’s previous … Read more

When rules of statutory interpretation change midstream

by

The evolution of statutory interpretation has significant implications for the judicial process, particularly as courts navigate complex legislative frameworks. Recent cases, such as FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., illustrate the shifting methodologies that courts employ in interpreting statutes. This transition from a purposivist approach, which emphasized congressional intent, to a textualist framework that prioritizes the literal text of the law marks a notable change in legal practice. Shifts in Methodology: From Purposivism to Textualism Historically, courts often adopted a purposivist stance, where the intent and objectives behind legislation were paramount … Read more

SCOTUS Today: December 9, 2023

by

On December 9, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is poised to deliberate on significant legal issues that could reshape the balance of power within the federal government. This date is historically relevant, marking 25 years since the Supreme Court intervened in the contentious 2000 presidential election by halting the recount in Florida. The case, which pitted then-candidate George W. Bush against Vice President Al Gore, set a precedent for the Court’s involvement in electoral disputes. As the current Court hears arguments, the implications of its decisions may resonate through the political … Read more