Challenges

Challenging Politically Discriminatory Funding Cuts

by

In recent years, the political landscape in the United States has witnessed an alarming trend where federal funding is increasingly being used as a tool for political discrimination. The Trump Administration’s approach to withholding federal funds from certain states and cities, particularly those labeled as “sanctuary jurisdictions,” raises significant legal and ethical questions. This tactic, often employed to enforce compliance with federal immigration policies, has sparked a series of legal challenges that delve into the constitutional implications of such actions. Legal Framework Surrounding Funding Cuts The legal arguments against the President’s unilateral funding cuts primarily … Read more

Supreme Court Further Closes the Prison Gates

by

On January 20, 2023, the Supreme Court took a significant step that may have far-reaching implications for access to justice, particularly for incarcerated individuals. In a routine order, the Court dismissed a petition from Danny Howell, denying his request to file without paying court fees due to financial hardship. However, the Court’s decision did not stop there; it also barred Howell from filing any future noncriminal petitions in forma pauperis, a move that has drawn criticism from legal experts and advocates alike. Implications of the Court’s Decision Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed her dissent against … Read more

SCOTUS Today for February 2, 2023

by

As the Supreme Court continues its deliberations, significant developments are anticipated on February 2, 2023. With the recent milestone marking 20 years since Justice Samuel Alito took his seat, discussions surrounding his potential retirement have resurfaced. President Donald Trump’s recent comments suggest a desire for Alito to remain on the bench, further fueling speculation about the future composition of the court. Understanding In-Chambers Opinions The concept of in-chambers opinions has gained attention in recent times, particularly as the Supreme Court’s emergency docket has become more prominent. Traditionally, in-chambers opinions are written by a single justice, … Read more

Supreme Court to Hear Birthright Citizenship Case on April 1

by

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on April 1 regarding a significant challenge to the concept of birthright citizenship in the United States. This case arises from an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, which aimed to end the automatic granting of citizenship to children born in the country to non-citizen parents. The implications of this case are profound, as they touch upon constitutional rights and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has historically guaranteed citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil. Background of the Case The legal … Read more