Claims

Justices Doubt the Necessity of Outdated Assumptions in Pension Plan Assessments

by

During the recent oral arguments in M&K Employee Solutions v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund, the Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism regarding the requirement for actuaries to rely on outdated assumptions when calculating costs associated with leaving a multiemployer pension plan. This case raises significant questions about the methodologies used in pension fund assessments, particularly in the context of defined-benefit plans, which are often more complex than their defined-contribution counterparts. The Nature of Multiemployer Pension Plans Multiemployer pension plans are arrangements where several employers from the same industry collaborate to provide retirement benefits … Read more

Only electoral reform, not the court, can protect against an American Caesar

by

The current political landscape in the United States raises significant concerns regarding the preservation of democratic principles and the rule of law. With the increasing centralization of power and disregard for constitutional constraints, the question arises: how can American democracy be safeguarded? The answer may lie not in the judiciary but in comprehensive electoral reform. This approach not only addresses the immediate threats posed by potential autocratic governance but also fortifies the democratic structures that enable citizen participation and representation. The Role of Electoral Reform in Safeguarding Democracy Electoral reform is essential in creating a … Read more

The Full Fed Battle: Implications and Context

by

The ongoing legal battle surrounding the Federal Reserve has garnered significant attention, particularly in light of President Donald Trump’s efforts to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The case, known as Trump v. Cook, raises crucial questions about the independence of the Federal Reserve and the extent of presidential power over its officials. As the arguments unfold in the Supreme Court, the implications for monetary policy and government accountability are profound, drawing in various stakeholders from across the political spectrum. The Significance of the Case The case is particularly significant as it challenges the established … Read more

The Relist Logjam Finally Breaks

by

The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have sparked significant discussions regarding the relist logjam that has affected several high-profile cases. As the court approaches the end of its October 2025-26 term, the implications of these rulings are becoming clearer. The relist process, where cases are brought back for consideration after initial review, plays a critical role in shaping legal precedents and addressing pressing legal questions. Understanding the Relist Process The relist process is essential for the Supreme Court, allowing justices to reconsider cases that may have previously been set aside. This reconsideration can stem from new … Read more