California Toughens AI Regulations: Essential Compliance Steps for Employers as Automated Decision-Making Tools Reshape Workplace Dynamics

Sacramento, California — As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes various sectors, companies are increasingly adopting AI tools within their workforce. In response, California regulators are taking proactive measures to address the legal implications associated with these evolving technologies. On July 24, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) established new regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) that focus on automated decision-making technology (ADMT). These new rules will become effective once they receive approval from the Office of Administrative Law. ADMT is defined broadly to encompass any technology that processes personal information to replace or … Read more

New York’s Prenatal Leave Law Sparks Controversy and Confusion Among Employers

New York, New York — A new prenatal leave law in New York is prompting discussions among employers about its implications and enforcement. The legislation, which aims to provide protection and support for workers expecting a child, is stirring varying opinions from businesses regarding operational adjustments and compliance. The law mandates that employers with four or more employees must offer up to 12 weeks of paid leave for individuals who are pregnant. This leave can be utilized during pregnancy and following the birth of the child, an effort to support parents’ well-being and family bonding. … Read more

California Court Rules in Favor of Employers: Retaliation Verdict Without Relief Means No Attorney’s Fees

Los Angeles, California — A recent ruling by the California Court of Appeal has stirred significant discussion regarding whistleblower retaliation claims. In a case involving former Deputy D’Andre Lampkin and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, the court clarified the nuances of liability and the subsequent inability of a plaintiff to recover attorney’s fees even after proving unlawful retaliation. The case began when Lampkin reported misconduct by a retired deputy, which he alleged led to a series of retaliatory actions against him, including being suspended and losing his medical benefits. He subsequently filed a whistleblower … Read more

4th Circuit Upholds Employer’s Right in COVID Vaccine Exemption Case, Setting Legal Precedent

RICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court has affirmed a lower court’s decision favorable to an employer in a legal challenge regarding religious exemptions to COVID-19 vaccination mandates. The ruling, issued by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, affects a case involving a group of employees at a Virginia company who sought exemptions from the company’s vaccination policy due to their religious beliefs. The decision stemmed from a lawsuit filed by employees claiming the company’s mandatory vaccination policy infringed on their rights to practice their religion. The employees argued that the vaccine conflicted with their … Read more