Greenpeace

Greenpeace Challenges $667M Jury Award in High-Stakes Dakota Access Pipeline Case

by

BISMARCK, N.D. – Greenpeace has filed a motion to reduce a jury’s substantial award of $667 million in a recent trial concerning the Dakota Access Pipeline, arguing that the damages are excessively high. The case emerged from events that unfolded during the pipeline’s construction, which sparked significant controversies and protests. The jury’s decision to impose such a hefty financial penalty came in response to claims filed by Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the pipeline. This decision was intended to address losses the company allegedly suffered due to direct actions taken by Greenpeace activists. The … Read more

Greenpeace Challenges $667 Million Verdict in Dakota Access Pipeline Protest Case, Claims Jury’s Decision Lacks Merit

by

BISMARCK, N.D. — Greenpeace representatives contested a recent jury verdict in a North Dakota courtroom, arguing that the $667 million ruling against the organization, stemming from protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, is grounded in inaccuracies. Attorneys for the environmental activist group asserted that the March ruling in Morton County should not be upheld. They contended that the jury found Greenpeace liable for defamation against Energy Transfer, the Dallas-based corporation that has significant pipeline operations across several states, including Oklahoma. During the proceedings, Everett Jack, representing Greenpeace’s U.S. affiliate, argued that the jury’s decision reflected … Read more

Greenpeace Appeals Court Ruling, Claims Jury’s Verdict Driven by Desire for Punishment Over Pipeline Protests

by

Bismarck, North Dakota – Greenpeace is challenging a recent court ruling linked to pipeline protests, asserting that the jury’s decision was swayed by a desire to penalize activists rather than assess the situation fairly. The environmental organization is seeking to overturn the verdict, which they believe threatens the rights of those advocating for ecological preservation. In the case at hand, activists were embroiled in protests against the construction of a pipeline that they argue poses significant environmental risks. The trial has drawn attention not only for its legal implications but also for the broader context … Read more

Greenpeace Appeals for Justice: Claims Jury’s Verdict is a Misguided Response to Pipeline Protests

by

PIERRE, S.D. — Greenpeace has announced plans to appeal a recent court ruling, claiming that the jury was influenced by a desire to hold someone accountable for protests against pipeline construction. The environmental group contends that the decision undermines the rights of individuals to express dissent. The controversy stems from protests linked to a major pipeline project, which has faced significant opposition from environmentalists and indigenous groups. Greenpeace argues that participants in these demonstrations are being unfairly targeted as a result of this verdict, emphasizing their commitment to peaceful activism. In their appeal, Greenpeace’s legal … Read more