Groundless

Supreme Court Critiques Groundless Claims in Challenge to Lawyer Senior Designations

by

New Delhi, India – The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed strong disapproval of the unfounded accusations leveled against its judges in a legal challenge regarding the assignment of senior designations to certain attorneys. The judicial duo presiding over the matter, Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan, addressed the claims presented in the plea, which suggested a nepotistic bias in the legal community toward judges’ relations who are lawyers. The petition, initiated by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara alongside several practicing lawyers, contended that the process of conferring senior status on lawyers was not only … Read more

Jay-Z’s Legal Battle Intensifies: Attorney Accuses Opposing Counsel of Extortion and Filing a Groundless Suit

by

Legal tensions are escalating in a complex battle involving high-profile figures in the entertainment industry. Attorney Alex Spiro, representing rapper Jay-Z, has launched a legal counterattack against lawyer Tony Buzbee, accusing him of questionable legal tactics and misconduct. The dispute hinges on serious allegations within a lawsuit initially filed under a pseudonym, implicating Jay-Z, whose real name is Shawn Corey Carter, and Sean “Diddy” Combs in a distressing incident dating back to the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards. The complaint alleges that the two were involved in the rape of a 13-year-old—an accusation both vehemently … Read more

Legal Repercussions: Attorney Faces Liability for Groundless Lawsuit in Groundbreaking Case

by

Boston, MA — In a recent ruling, a Massachusetts court held a practicing attorney responsible for the consequences of filing a lawsuit deemed completely without merit. The decision underscores the judiciary’s intolerance for legal actions perceived as frivolous, often seen as burdensome to the legal system and unfair to defendants. The attorney in question is now facing joint and several liability, a legal doctrine which binds them together with their client to cover the costs incurred by the opposition in defending the baseless claims. This ruling aims to serve as a deterrent against the misuse … Read more