Judicial

Judiciary To Remain Open Until Feb. 5

by

In a recent announcement, the Judiciary confirmed its commitment to remaining operational until February 5, despite potential funding challenges. This decision comes in light of the impending lapse in appropriations set for January 30, which could affect various federal operations. The Judiciary has outlined its plans to utilize existing court fee balances and other non-appropriation dependent funds to maintain its essential functions and services during this period. Operational Continuity Amid Funding Uncertainty The Judiciary will continue its paid operations through February 4, ensuring that most proceedings and deadlines will proceed as scheduled. However, there may … Read more

Can Traditionalism Be Originalist?

by

The debate surrounding the compatibility of traditionalism and originalism in constitutional interpretation has gained traction in recent years. Originalists assert that constitutional provisions should be understood according to their original public meaning at the time of ratification. However, the question arises: can the evolving practices and interpretations that have emerged since ratification inform our understanding of these provisions? This inquiry is crucial as it touches on the balance between adhering to the Constitution’s original intent and acknowledging the significance of historical practices that have developed over time. Understanding Originalism and Traditionalism Originalism is a judicial … Read more

Chief Justice Roberts Issues 2025 Year-End Report

by

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. has officially released his 2025 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, marking a significant milestone as this is the 21st report he has delivered since his appointment in 2005. This report encapsulates the activities and developments within the federal judiciary over the past year, reflecting on both challenges and accomplishments. As the judiciary continues to evolve, the Chief Justice’s insights provide an essential overview of the current state and future direction of the federal court system. Key Highlights from the 2025 Report In his report, Chief Justice Roberts emphasizes … Read more

Court Holds There is a Time Limit on Challenging Void Judgments

by

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton underscores the significance of adhering to procedural timelines when contesting legal judgments. This case highlights a critical interpretation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1), which establishes that litigants must act within a reasonable timeframe to challenge judgments deemed void. The implications of this ruling extend beyond the specifics of the case itself, reinforcing the importance of timely legal action in the judicial process. Background of the Case The dispute originated from bankruptcy proceedings involving Vista-Pro Automotive, LLC, which began over … Read more