Lawsuit

supreme advocacy: supreme on style, a bit light on substance

by

The documentary titled “Supreme Advocacy: What It Takes to Argue at the Supreme Court,” directed by Andrew Satter, presents a captivating yet somewhat superficial look into the life of a Supreme Court litigator. It follows Roman Martinez, a partner at Latham & Watkins, as he prepares for and argues the case of A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools. This case revolves around the educational accommodations for a teenage girl with severe epilepsy, challenging the existing federal disability discrimination laws. While the film does well in showcasing the advocacy process, it may leave viewers wanting more depth … Read more

What in the world is “zombie precedent”?

by

The term “zombie precedent” is a fascinating concept in legal discourse, particularly in discussions surrounding judicial decisions that have outlived their original context or support. This intriguing phrase was popularized by Justice Antonin Scalia, who likened certain Supreme Court rulings to a ghoul that refuses to stay buried. Specifically, Scalia referred to the infamous Lemon test, which has haunted the court’s Establishment Clause jurisprudence for decades. The notion of a zombie precedent encapsulates the idea that some legal precedents can linger, re-emerging in legal arguments despite being largely discredited or abandoned. The Origins of Zombie … Read more

Party Presentation: A Mysterious New Rule?

by

The recent ruling in Clark v. Sweeney has sparked discussions about the implications of party presentation in the legal system. This case, decided by the Supreme Court, introduces a principle that could redefine how courts evaluate arguments presented by parties in criminal cases. The concept of party presentation suggests that courts should rely solely on the arguments made by the litigants, raising questions about the potential consequences for justice and fairness in legal proceedings. The Principle of Party Presentation The principle of party presentation posits that courts are bound to consider only the arguments that … Read more

Which Supreme Court Cases Are Actually Important?

by

The significance of Supreme Court cases often sparks intense debate among scholars, legal professionals, and the general public. While many rulings may seem crucial at first glance, determining which cases hold enduring importance requires a more nuanced approach. This discussion delves into the factors that contribute to the perceived importance of certain Supreme Court decisions, particularly in light of recent trends in judicial behavior and public perception. Understanding the Criteria for Importance To assess the importance of Supreme Court cases, one must consider several criteria. The most common method involves analyzing the outcomes and the … Read more