Regulations

Relist Rodeo: Firearm Restrictions, Searches Incident to Arrest, DNA Evidence, and ‘Clearly Established’ Law

by

The Supreme Court’s relist process has garnered significant attention, especially as the Court prepares for its upcoming term. With a pressing calendar and a multitude of cases awaiting review, the relist phenomenon serves as a critical mechanism for revisiting contentious legal issues. Among the topics currently under consideration are firearm restrictions, searches incident to arrest, and the implications of DNA evidence in legal proceedings. This segment will delve into these pivotal areas, emphasizing their relevance within the broader context of jurisprudence. Firearm Restrictions and Their Legal Challenges One of the most pressing issues in the … Read more

Supreme Court Difficult to Read in Case on Campaign Finance Limitations

by

The recent proceedings of the Supreme Court have brought to light significant challenges surrounding campaign finance limitations. The case, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, involves a dispute over federal laws that restrict the amount of money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates. As the justices deliberated, the atmosphere was charged with questions regarding the balance between free speech and regulatory measures in electoral politics. Context of the Case During the oral arguments, which lasted over two hours, various justices expressed sympathy towards the challengers’ stance that these expenditure limits infringe … Read more

Originalism’s Campaign Finance Conundrum

by

The intersection of originalism and campaign finance presents a complex legal and philosophical dilemma for the Supreme Court. At the heart of this issue lies the tension between historical interpretation of constitutional principles and contemporary understandings of political finance. As originalism gains traction among justices, particularly with cases like campaign finance limitations, its implications for existing precedents warrant careful examination. the historical context of campaign finance the supreme court's interpretation of campaign finance began to take shape in the 1970s amid rising concerns over the influence of money in politics. congress responded to these concerns … Read more

Court seems likely to side with Trump on president’s power to fire FTC commissioner

by

The recent Supreme Court hearings have raised significant questions regarding the extent of presidential authority in relation to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The case, Trump v. Slaughter, has brought forth arguments that challenge a federal law restricting the president’s ability to dismiss FTC commissioners. As the justices deliberated, the implications of their decision could reshape the balance of power between the executive branch and independent regulatory agencies. Background of the Case During the oral arguments, a majority of the justices appeared to lean towards the view that the law, which limits the president’s ability … Read more