Rights

Court to Consider the Role of IQ Tests in Ban on Executing People Who Are Intellectually Disabled

by

The question of whether individuals with intellectual disabilities should be exempt from the death penalty has gained renewed attention as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the case of Hamm v. Smith. This case will address the complexities surrounding the assessment of intellectual disability, particularly in relation to IQ testing. The outcome could have significant implications for how courts evaluate similar claims in the future, especially in light of the precedent set by the landmark decision in Atkins v. Virginia in 2002, which ruled that executing individuals with intellectual disabilities constitutes cruel and … Read more

The Who’s and What’s of Presidential Power

by

The concept of presidential power in the United States is a complex and multifaceted issue that has evolved significantly over the years. This power encompasses various aspects of governance, including the authority to enact legislation, command the military, and manage foreign relations. The interpretation and scope of this power are often subject to judicial review, particularly in cases that challenge the boundaries of executive authority. As the nation navigates through contemporary political landscapes, understanding the nuances of presidential power becomes increasingly important. Understanding Presidential Authority Presidential power is derived from the Constitution, specifically Article II, … Read more

SCOTUS Today: December 5 Updates

by

As the December sitting of the Supreme Court reaches its midpoint, significant cases and decisions are capturing the attention of legal analysts and the public alike. This week, the Court has been engaged in discussions that could have lasting implications on various legal fronts, especially regarding the contentious issue of redistricting. The cases heard so far have sparked debates about fairness, representation, and the intricacies of state laws. Current Cases Before the Court The Supreme Court is currently examining several pivotal cases that address fundamental issues of governance and civil rights. Each case presents unique … Read more

Court to Hear Arguments on Campaign Finance Limitations

by

On December 9, the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in a pivotal case concerning campaign finance regulations. The case, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, challenges the limits imposed on coordinated expenditures by political parties. This hearing comes nearly 25 years after the Court upheld these limitations in Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Federal Republican Campaign Committee. The implications of the Court’s forthcoming decision could significantly alter the landscape of campaign finance in the United States. Background of the Case The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), alongside other challengers, argues … Read more