Ruling

Court Leans Against Applying Fugitive Tolling in Federal Supervised Release

by

The recent Supreme Court case, Rico v. United States, has brought significant attention to the doctrine of fugitive tolling in the context of federal supervised release. This legal principle raises crucial questions about the rights of defendants who flee from their probation officers during their term of supervised release. The implications of the court’s ruling could reshape how supervised release is enforced and interpreted, particularly concerning the expiration of supervision terms while a defendant is considered a fugitive. Understanding Fugitive Tolling Fugitive tolling is primarily governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i), which delineates the conditions … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Wednesday, November 5

by

On November 5, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) convenes to address significant legal issues, particularly concerning the major questions doctrine and its implications for executive power. This doctrine scrutinizes the extent of authority that Congress grants to the executive branch, especially in matters of substantial economic and political significance. Today, the court will hear oral arguments related to the tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which raises questions about the scope of presidential power in economic matters. Understanding the Major Questions Doctrine The … Read more

Johnson & Johnson’s Talc Turmoil: Bankruptcy Court Ruling Signals Setback for Tort Claims

by

Johnson & Johnson’s legal struggles intensified as a recent bankruptcy court ruling underscored the company’s tumultuous journey regarding talc-based products. In a battle that has spanned several years, the company faced backlash over claims that its talc products contained asbestos and led to serious health issues. During a session on Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan rejected Johnson & Johnson’s proposal to resolve thousands of lawsuits tied to its talc products through a bankruptcy filing. This decision highlighted the challenges corporations face when attempting to manage large-scale litigations in court, especially those alleging misrepresentation and … Read more

Johnson & Johnson Faces Major Setback as Talc Bankruptcy Ruling Fires Back on Tort Liabilities

by

WASHINGTON — Johnson & Johnson faces significant legal hurdles as a federal bankruptcy judge recently dismissed the company’s bid to shield itself from thousands of claims related to its talc products. This decision highlights the growing tension between corporate bankruptcy protections and consumer rights, particularly in cases involving injury claims linked to products. The ruling directly impacts J&J’s strategy to manage more than 38,000 lawsuits alleging that its talc-containing products, such as baby powder, cause cancer. The judge concluded that the company’s attempts to use bankruptcy court to resolve these claims lacked sufficient grounds, marking … Read more