Ruling

Federal Judge Dismisses Ballot Eligibility Challenge Against Former President Trump, Ruling It Lacked Proper Standing

by

LAS VEGAS, Nevada — A federal judge in Nevada dismissed a ballot eligibility challenge against former President Trump on Tuesday. The challenge was brought by long-shot GOP presidential candidate John Anthony Castro, who was deemed to lack proper standing by Judge Gloria Navarro. According to Navarro, Castro filed to run for president solely to manufacture legal standing, which was deemed improper by the court. Navarro referenced an October article by The Associated Press in which Castro admitted that his candidacy was not a serious pursuit but rather an attempt to enforce the United States Constitution. … Read more

Judge’s Ruling Paves the Way for Future Development in Springfield’s University Heights Neighborhood

by

A judge in Springfield, Missouri issued a partial ruling in a lawsuit regarding the development plans for the University Heights Neighborhood. The lawsuit revolves around allegations that Be Kind and Merciful, a development company, has violated deed restrictions in the area. According to the University Heights Neighborhood Association, a 100-year-old deed explicitly prohibits the construction of anything other than residential homes. Be Kind and Merciful developers have expressed their desire to rezone over two acres of land at the intersection of Sunshine and National, changing it from single-family residential to general retail. However, the judge … Read more

Judge’s Ruling Spells the End for Tylenol Autism Lawsuits in Federal Court, Shifts Focus to State Courts

by

New York City, NY – The Tylenol autism lawsuits that have been pending in federal court have suffered a major blow. Judge Denise Cote ruled that the evidence presented by the plaintiffs, which aimed to establish a link between Tylenol and autism, did not meet the standards for admissibility in court. As a result, all cases in the Tylenol autism multidistrict litigation (MDL) will be dismissed, effectively putting an end to any further Tylenol autism lawsuits in federal courts. However, the future of these lawsuits may still continue in state courts. The Tylenol autism lawsuits … Read more

Landmark Ruling: Fourth Circuit Determines Indictment Not Considered a ‘Claim’ Under Lawyer’s Liability Policy

by

Columbia, MD – In a recent decision, the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of Wiley’s clients, stating that a federal indictment with a criminal forfeiture allegation does not qualify as a “claim” under a law firm’s professional liability policy. The court argued that a forfeiture allegation does not meet the requirements of a “written demand” as outlined in the policy’s definition of a claim. The case involved an insured attorney who sought coverage for a Department of Justice subpoena and subsequent criminal indictment. The indictment charged the attorney with conspiracy, money laundering, and forfeiture related … Read more