Ruling

Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on sex designations on passports

by

The Supreme Court has recently ruled in favor of the Trump administration regarding the sex designations on U.S. passports. This decision comes as a significant moment for both the administration and the ongoing discussions surrounding transgender rights and recognition. The ruling temporarily halts previous court orders that would have allowed transgender and nonbinary individuals to have their chosen sex reflected on their passports, a move that highlights the contentious nature of this issue within the legal landscape. Background of the Case Earlier this year, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued rulings that would have mandated … Read more

Court Leans Against Applying Fugitive Tolling in Federal Supervised Release

by

The recent Supreme Court case, Rico v. United States, has brought significant attention to the doctrine of fugitive tolling in the context of federal supervised release. This legal principle raises crucial questions about the rights of defendants who flee from their probation officers during their term of supervised release. The implications of the court’s ruling could reshape how supervised release is enforced and interpreted, particularly concerning the expiration of supervision terms while a defendant is considered a fugitive. Understanding Fugitive Tolling Fugitive tolling is primarily governed by 18 U.S.C. ยง 3583(i), which delineates the conditions … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Wednesday, November 5

by

On November 5, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) convenes to address significant legal issues, particularly concerning the major questions doctrine and its implications for executive power. This doctrine scrutinizes the extent of authority that Congress grants to the executive branch, especially in matters of substantial economic and political significance. Today, the court will hear oral arguments related to the tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which raises questions about the scope of presidential power in economic matters. Understanding the Major Questions Doctrine The … Read more

Johnson & Johnson’s Talc Turmoil: Bankruptcy Court Ruling Signals Setback for Tort Claims

by

Johnson & Johnson’s legal struggles intensified as a recent bankruptcy court ruling underscored the company’s tumultuous journey regarding talc-based products. In a battle that has spanned several years, the company faced backlash over claims that its talc products contained asbestos and led to serious health issues. During a session on Wednesday, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan rejected Johnson & Johnson’s proposal to resolve thousands of lawsuits tied to its talc products through a bankruptcy filing. This decision highlighted the challenges corporations face when attempting to manage large-scale litigations in court, especially those alleging misrepresentation and … Read more