Justices Clarify Restitution Requirements for Federal Convicts

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the implications of the ex post facto clause in relation to restitution obligations under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA). The case, Ellingburg v. United States, centered on whether the requirement for Holsey Ellingburg to pay restitution could be altered retroactively after the commission of his crimes but before his sentencing. The unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, underscored the constitutional protections against retroactive increases in punishment, establishing a clear boundary for federal criminal proceedings. Understanding the Ex Post Facto Clause The ex post facto clause … Read more

SCOTUS today for Wednesday, January 21

This morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a significant case concerning President Donald Trump’s decision to terminate Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The case has garnered considerable attention due to its implications for executive power and the independence of federal agencies. As the hearing unfolds, we will provide live updates starting at 9:30 a.m. EST, allowing legal experts and the public to engage with the proceedings in real-time. Latest Opinions from the Court On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court released opinions on three argued cases: Berk v. Choy, Ellingburg v. United States, and … Read more

Court Unanimously Holds that Double Jeopardy Bars Convictions for Two Firearm Offenses

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of double jeopardy in the case of Barrett v. United States. This decision clarifies the application of the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, particularly in relation to firearm offenses under federal law. The ruling emphasizes the importance of legislative intent when determining whether multiple convictions can arise from a single act that violates closely related statutes. Understanding the Double Jeopardy Clause The double jeopardy clause, found in the Fifth Amendment, protects individuals from being tried or punished for the same offense more than once. In … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Friday, January 9

Good morning, and welcome to what is expected to be a significant day in the Supreme Court’s calendar. As the first opinion day of the 2025-26 term unfolds, the legal community anticipates a range of decisions that could have substantial implications for various areas of law. The atmosphere is charged with speculation, and while we await the outcomes, we will be live blogging throughout the day to provide real-time updates and insights. Supreme Court’s Role in Shaping Law The Supreme Court of the United States plays a pivotal role in interpreting the Constitution and federal … Read more