Supreme

Justice Jackson’s Dissents: A Critical Examination

by

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, has quickly become known for her incisive and often pointed dissents. In a court that is predominantly conservative, her dissenting opinions serve not only as legal rebuttals but also as statements on the broader implications of the court’s decisions. This segment explores her approach to dissent, particularly in the context of civil rights and democratic engagement. The Role of Dissent in Justice Jackson’s Jurisprudence Justice Jackson’s dissents reflect a deep commitment to the principles of justice and equality. Unlike her colleagues … Read more

Supreme Court to Consider Federal Courts’ Role in Asylum Cases

by

On December 1, the Supreme Court will deliberate on the case of Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, focusing on the critical role of federal courts in asylum proceedings. This case raises significant questions about whether federal appellate courts should defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) when evaluating claims made by asylum seekers. The decision could have far-reaching implications for countless individuals seeking refuge from persecution. Background of the Case The legal challenge originates from the asylum application of Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana, Sayra Iliana Gamez-Mejia, and their minor child, who fled El Salvador in 2021. They … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, November 25

by

On November 25, 2020, the Supreme Court issued a late-night order that blocked the enforcement of New York’s attendance restrictions for houses of worship during the COVID-19 pandemic. This decision highlighted the Court’s ongoing engagement with issues surrounding religious freedoms and governmental regulations, particularly in the context of public health. As Thanksgiving approaches, it is pertinent to reflect on how the Court has historically interacted with the holiday’s significance and the broader implications for church-state relations. SCOTUS Quick Hits In the latest updates from the Supreme Court, several notable cases are currently under consideration, including … Read more

Challengers to Texas Redistricting Map Urge Justices to Strike It as Racially Discriminatory

by

Civil rights groups and Texas residents have raised significant concerns regarding the new congressional map adopted by the Texas Legislature in August. They argue that this map is racially discriminatory and violates the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The challengers, including the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, have urged the Supreme Court to uphold a ruling from a three-judge district court that prohibited the state from using the map in the upcoming 2026 elections. Background of the Redistricting Controversy The dispute over the Texas congressional map has its roots in a directive from President Donald Trump, who … Read more