Trumps

Unveiling the Legal Drama: Three-Judge Panel Deliberates Trump’s Trial

by

WASHINGTON (AP) — A three-judge panel in Washington, D.C. heard arguments on Tuesday regarding the trial of former President Donald Trump. The panel, composed of Judges Patricia Millett, Judith Roberts, and Neomi Rao, weighed the case against Trump for his alleged incitement of the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The oral arguments lasted for several hours, with both the House impeachment managers and Trump’s defense team presenting their cases. The impeachment managers asserted that Trump’s actions on the day of the insurrection constituted a direct incitement of violence. They argued that his repeated false claims about … Read more

Lawmaker Slams Trump’s Lawyers for Dangerous Claim: Presidents Incentivized to Assassinate Senators

by

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congressman Jamie Raskin, a Democrat representing Maryland, criticized former President Donald Trump’s attorney for making what he called an “utterly ludicrous” argument in federal court on Tuesday. John Sauer, the attorney, appeared before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and argued that the former president is immune from criminal prosecution. During the court proceedings, Judge Florence Pan posed a hypothetical question to Sauer, asking if a president could order the assassination of a political rival. Sauer responded that a president would have to be impeached and convicted before facing criminal prosecution. This … Read more

Former President Donald Trump’s Argument for Absolute Immunity Faces Scrutiny in Federal Court

by

Washington, DC – Former President Donald Trump’s claim of “absolute immunity” from prosecution was challenged in federal court on Tuesday. The question being debated is whether Trump and all presidents have protection from criminal prosecution. Trump currently faces multiple criminal cases, and his legal strategy is to argue that he cannot be prosecuted due to the risk of political prosecutions. However, the judges hearing the appeal seemed skeptical of this argument. One of Trump’s lawyers argued that a president could not be prosecuted for certain actions, such as selling pardons or state secrets, as long … Read more

Federal Appeals Panel Questions Trump’s Claim of Immunity in Election Subversion Case, Potentially Impacting Presidential Power and Accountability

by

Washington, DC – A federal appeals panel expressed serious doubts regarding former President Donald Trump’s argument that he cannot be prosecuted for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. The panel raised concerns about the far-reaching implications of absolute presidential immunity. During the hearing, Trump’s lawyers contended that their client’s federal election subversion indictment should be dismissed due to his immunity from prosecution. However, the judges on the panel questioned whether this immunity theory would permit presidents to engage in activities such as selling pardons or even assassinating political opponents. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team … Read more