Subversion

Trump Ally Jeffrey Clark Violated Professional Conduct Rules, Faces Disciplinary Action for Aiding in Election Subversion

by

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jeffrey Clark, a former Department of Justice official and key ally of former President Donald Trump, has been found to have violated professional conduct rules by assisting in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia. A three-member ethics panel in Washington, D.C. reached this preliminary decision on Thursday, opening the door for potential disciplinary actions against Clark. The disciplinary counsel is reportedly seeking the revocation of Clark’s law license. Clark, who has been licensed to practice in D.C. since 1997, could face suspension or disbarment. The final decision on … Read more

Federal Appeals Panel Questions Trump’s Claim of Immunity in Election Subversion Case, Potentially Impacting Presidential Power and Accountability

by

Washington, DC – A federal appeals panel expressed serious doubts regarding former President Donald Trump’s argument that he cannot be prosecuted for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. The panel raised concerns about the far-reaching implications of absolute presidential immunity. During the hearing, Trump’s lawyers contended that their client’s federal election subversion indictment should be dismissed due to his immunity from prosecution. However, the judges on the panel questioned whether this immunity theory would permit presidents to engage in activities such as selling pardons or even assassinating political opponents. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team … Read more

Federal Judges Question Trump’s Claim of Immunity in Election Subversion Lawsuit

by

WASHINGTON – In a high-profile case that could have significant implications for future elections, judges expressed skepticism regarding former President Donald Trump’s claim of immunity. The case involves allegations of election subversion during the 2020 election. The hearing took place on Monday at a federal court in Washington, D.C. During the proceedings, the judges scrutinized the argument put forward by Trump’s legal team, which asserts that the former president is immune from legal action due to the official duties he carried out while in office. The judges questioned whether such immunity extends to actions that … Read more