Legal Battle Brewing: Jury to Determine If Amazon Prime’s Cancellation Process is Unfair

A jury in Seattle will soon determine whether Amazon Prime’s cancellation process is overly complicated. This case comes amid growing scrutiny over the subscription service’s practices. The lawsuit, initiated by two customers, claims that Amazon makes it deliberately challenging for users to discontinue their subscriptions. They allege that the company’s cancellation method is confusing, which can lead to unintentional renewals and additional charges. Plaintiffs are seeking class-action status for their claims, suggesting that many customers might have experienced similar frustrations. During the trial, the jury will assess whether Amazon’s cancellation procedures violate consumer protection laws. … Read more

Oregon Takes Charge: New Consumer Protection Laws Set to Shield Residents from Medical Debt and Unfair Auto Financing

Salem, Ore. — Beginning in 2026, Oregonians will see significant changes in consumer protections, as new state laws aim to alleviate some of the financial burdens faced by residents. Under these laws, unpaid medical bills will no longer affect credit ratings, and car dealership financing terms cannot be altered after a sale is completed. Governor Tina Kotek recently convened with lawmakers and advocates in Salem to mark the passage of these measures. The legislation, which also includes a requirement for online retailers to disclose fees transparently before customers check out, is a response to gaps … Read more

Federal Jury Slaps American Express with $12.5 Million Verdict for Unfair Practices Amid Antitrust Claims Dismissal

NEW YORK — A federal jury has ordered American Express Co. to pay $12.5 million in damages after finding the company engaged in unfair practices under Illinois law, although it was cleared of various antitrust allegations that had also been brought against it. The verdict, delivered on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, stemmed from a protracted legal battle initiated by state consumers. Those consumers challenged certain nondiscrimination clauses present in American Express’s agreements with merchants who accept its credit cards. These provisions specifically prohibit steering practices, which … Read more

Delving into Public Nuisance Claims: Tune into Episode 17 of the Unfair Competition Defense Podcast

Chicago, Illinois — Episode 17 of the Unfair Competition Defense Podcast delves into the rising prominence of public nuisance claims in mass tort litigation. Host Greg Nylen welcomes Frank Citera, a shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, to explore this intricate area of law. Citera provides insights on how public nuisance claims have emerged as key considerations in various legal disputes, particularly in cases involving multiple plaintiffs seeking collective redress. These claims often arise in industries that have significant impacts on public health and safety, making their implications far-reaching. The Unfair Competition Defense Podcast, produced by Greenberg … Read more