publiclawlibrary.org

Court to Consider the Role of IQ Tests in Ban on Executing People Who Are Intellectually Disabled

by

The question of whether individuals with intellectual disabilities should be exempt from the death penalty has gained renewed attention as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the case of Hamm v. Smith. This case will address the complexities surrounding the assessment of intellectual disability, particularly in relation to IQ testing. The outcome could have significant implications for how courts evaluate similar claims in the future, especially in light of the precedent set by the landmark decision in Atkins v. Virginia in 2002, which ruled that executing individuals with intellectual disabilities constitutes cruel and … Read more

The Who’s and What’s of Presidential Power

by

The concept of presidential power in the United States is a complex and multifaceted issue that has evolved significantly over the years. This power encompasses various aspects of governance, including the authority to enact legislation, command the military, and manage foreign relations. The interpretation and scope of this power are often subject to judicial review, particularly in cases that challenge the boundaries of executive authority. As the nation navigates through contemporary political landscapes, understanding the nuances of presidential power becomes increasingly important. Understanding Presidential Authority Presidential power is derived from the Constitution, specifically Article II, … Read more

SCOTUS Today: December 5 Updates

by

As the December sitting of the Supreme Court reaches its midpoint, significant cases and decisions are capturing the attention of legal analysts and the public alike. This week, the Court has been engaged in discussions that could have lasting implications on various legal fronts, especially regarding the contentious issue of redistricting. The cases heard so far have sparked debates about fairness, representation, and the intricacies of state laws. Current Cases Before the Court The Supreme Court is currently examining several pivotal cases that address fundamental issues of governance and civil rights. Each case presents unique … Read more

Supreme Court Allows Texas to Use Redistricting Map Challenged as Racially Discriminatory

by

On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued a significant ruling allowing Texas to proceed with its new congressional redistricting map, which has faced allegations of racial discrimination. This decision comes in light of a previous ruling from a three-judge district court in El Paso, which found the map unconstitutional due to its alleged manipulation of voter demographics based on race. The court’s brief, unsigned opinion has granted Texas a reprieve, enabling the state to utilize the contested map in the upcoming 2026 elections. Background of the Redistricting Controversy The controversy surrounding Texas’s redistricting map stems from … Read more