State Enforcement of Section Three Disqualification: What McConnell Gets Right on Trump v. Anderson and Why He’s Still Wrong

The debate surrounding the enforcement of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment has gained renewed attention following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Anderson. This case has significant implications for how states can enforce disqualifications from holding federal office. Leading legal scholars, including Professor Michael McConnell, have offered various interpretations of the ruling, examining both its textual and historical bases. While McConnell raises valid points regarding the Court’s reasoning, his conclusions about the broader implications of the ruling warrant further scrutiny. Understanding McConnell’s Perspective Professor McConnell’s analysis of the Court’s decision highlights several critical … Read more

Being a Justice Doesn’t Make You a Policy Expert

The role of justices in the American judicial system has evolved significantly, particularly concerning their influence on policy-making. Despite their legal expertise, there is a growing concern about the adequacy of their understanding of complex policy issues. This disconnect raises important questions about the appropriateness of their involvement in shaping policy, given their primary function is to interpret the law rather than to create it. The Historical Context of Lawyers in Governance Historically, lawyers have played a prominent role in the formation of American governance. At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, nearly two-thirds of the … Read more

Cybersecurity Measures Strengthened in Light of Attacks on Judiciary’s Case Management System

In response to a series of sophisticated cyberattacks targeting its case management system, the federal Judiciary has initiated enhanced cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive case documents. These escalated attacks have prompted the Judiciary to not only fortify the security of its existing systems but also to work closely with various governmental partners to mitigate the impact on litigants and maintain the integrity of the judicial process. The proactive steps being taken are essential to ensure that the Judiciary can continue to operate effectively in an increasingly digital landscape. Strengthening Cybersecurity Protocols The Administrative Office of … Read more

Judiciary Budget Crisis Could Worsen, Conference Is Told

The financial stability of the Judiciary is facing significant challenges as highlighted in a recent conference. Judge Amy J. St. Eve, chair of the Budget Committee, expressed grave concerns regarding the funding shortfalls that could escalate in the coming fiscal year. The potential impacts of these shortfalls are particularly troubling if federal courts are compelled to operate under a full-year continuing resolution. Concerns Over Funding Shortfalls During the Judicial Conference of the United States, Judge St. Eve indicated that the Judiciary’s funding request of $9.4 billion for FY 2026 is unlikely to be met, given … Read more