News

News

January’s Criminal Law Arguments – and is “Party Presentation” Morphing into a Court-Controlling Rule?

by

As the Supreme Court resumes its activities after the winter recess, significant discussions surrounding criminal law are expected to emerge. The first oral arguments of the year will commence on January 12, with a focus on several notable cases, including the pivotal Wolford v. Lopez, which will be argued later in the month. This case, along with others addressing the rights of trans individuals, could have profound implications for criminal law, highlighting the evolving landscape of judicial interpretation in this area. Overview of Upcoming Cases The Supreme Court will hear a total of nine cases … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, December 23

by

On December 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) continues its tradition of providing updates on significant legal matters, particularly as the holiday season approaches. This edition of SCOTUStoday highlights key developments and ongoing discussions within the Court, which is currently navigating complex issues ranging from birthright citizenship to redistricting. As the Court prepares for a brief hiatus during the holidays, legal enthusiasts and scholars alike are keenly observing the implications of these cases. Holiday Traditions at the Supreme Court The Supreme Court Building has a long-standing tradition of celebrating the holiday … Read more

SCOTUStoday for Monday, December 22

by

Today marks a significant milestone for the SCOTUStoday newsletter, as it celebrates three months of providing insightful updates on the Supreme Court. We appreciate the continued support from our readers, which fuels our commitment to delivering timely and relevant content. As the holiday season approaches, we would like to remind our audience that there will be abridged editions of SCOTUStoday sent out on the upcoming days, with a brief pause over the holiday weekend. SCOTUS Quick Hits The Supreme Court has recently made headlines by rejecting a request from the Trump administration regarding a policy … Read more

Supreme Court Rejects Trump Administration’s Request in Immigration Judges Dispute

by

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to reject a request from the Trump administration marks a significant moment in the ongoing dispute over the independence of immigration judges. This case centers around a policy that restricts immigration judges from discussing their roles publicly, raising critical questions about First Amendment rights and the autonomy of federal employees. The ruling, which has been characterized as a setback for the former administration, underscores the complexities involved in immigration law and the judiciary’s role in addressing these issues. Background of the Dispute The controversy began when the National Association of … Read more