Trump Administration and Legal Battle Over National Guard Deployment in Illinois

The deployment of the National Guard by the Trump administration has sparked a significant legal confrontation with state officials in Illinois and the city of Chicago. This conflict centers around the interpretation of federal law regarding the president’s authority to call upon the National Guard, particularly in situations where he believes he cannot rely on regular military forces to enforce federal laws. As the situation unfolds, both sides have presented their arguments to the Supreme Court, raising critical questions about the limits of executive power and the role of state authority in federal matters. Context … Read more

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Intervention on SNAP Payments

The Trump administration has once again approached the Supreme Court, requesting intervention to block a federal court order mandating full funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for the month of November. This appeal comes in the wake of a government shutdown, which has prompted significant concern over the continuation of vital food assistance for millions of Americans. U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr. of Rhode Island issued a ruling that would require the government to ensure full SNAP benefits, a decision that has been met with resistance from the administration. Background of … Read more

Justices Agree to Decide Major Election Law Case

In a pivotal moment for election law, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case that could redefine the parameters of ballot counting in federal elections. This case, known as Watson v. Republican National Committee, stems from a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day. The implications of this ruling could resonate across the United States, as similar laws exist in over 30 states and the District of Columbia. Background of the Case The dispute traces back … Read more

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case on Constitutionality of Same-Sex Marriage

The recent decision by the Supreme Court to decline a request for reconsideration of its 2015 ruling on same-sex marriage has significant implications for the ongoing debate surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. This decision stemmed from a case involving Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky, who had previously refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The refusal led to legal challenges that ultimately questioned the constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Background of the Case The controversy began after the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which established a … Read more