Politics

Advisory Opinions Live Broadcast: Trump’s Tariff Showdown

by

The recent oral arguments in the Supreme Court concerning President Trump’s tariffs have sparked significant debate and analysis among legal experts and political commentators. With the conclusion of these arguments, the Advisory Opinions podcast hosted a live broadcast to dissect the implications of the justices’ discussions and what might unfold next. This segment features insights from notable figures in the legal community, who share their perspectives on the case and its broader ramifications for trade policy and executive power. Key Highlights from the Live Broadcast During the live broadcast, host Sarah Isgur was joined by … Read more

The Meaning of “Election Day”

by

Election Day is a pivotal moment in the democratic process, marking the day when citizens cast their votes for various offices and measures. This day is typically set by law and varies by country, but in the United States, it occurs on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Understanding the implications of this day requires a closer examination of its historical context, legal definitions, and its significance in the electoral process. Historical Context of Election Day The establishment of Election Day in the United States dates back to the 19th century. Initially, … Read more

President Trump’s Tariffs vs. the Supreme Court’s Duties

by

In the complex landscape of American economic policy, President Donald Trump’s administration introduced a significant shift with the announcement of new tariffs during what he termed “Liberation Day.” This unprecedented move not only had immediate repercussions on global markets but also set the stage for a legal battle that would reach the Supreme Court. As the legal framework surrounding tariffs comes under scrutiny, the case of Learning Resources v. Trump raises pivotal questions about the extent of presidential powers in regulating international trade. Understanding Tariffs and Presidential Powers At the core of the discussion is … Read more

State Enforcement of Section Three Disqualification: What McConnell Gets Right on Trump v. Anderson and Why He’s Still Wrong

by

The ongoing legal debates surrounding Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment have sparked significant discourse among legal scholars and practitioners. In particular, Professor Michael McConnell’s analysis of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. Anderson has prompted a critical examination of the implications for state enforcement of disqualifications from federal office. While McConnell raises pertinent points regarding the Court’s reasoning and the historical context of the Fourteenth Amendment, his conclusions invite further scrutiny and challenge the broader understanding of state versus federal authority in this domain. McConnell’s Analysis of the Court’s Decision McConnell’s critique of … Read more