Case

Eleventh Circuit Rules Against MONY Life Insurance in Unjust Enrichment Case, Upholding Contractual Protections for Policyholder

by

TAMPA, Fla. — In a significant ruling, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a jury verdict that favored MONY Life Insurance Co. in a case against policyholder Bernard Perez, focusing on the principle of unjust enrichment. The court concluded that insurers cannot pursue claims for unjust enrichment if an explicit insurance agreement addressing the same matter exists. The dispute originated from a disagreement between MONY and Perez regarding benefits linked to a disability insurance policy. Perez was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma in 2011 and began receiving income replacement disability benefits while undergoing … Read more

Pennsylvania Courts Set Precedent in Monsanto Roundup Case with $175 Million Verdict Split

by

PHILADELPHIA — In a significant development for the legal landscape, Pennsylvania judges have created a split between federal and state courts over a $175 million verdict linked to Monsanto in the Roundup mass tort case during the first half of 2025. This ruling contributes to the complicated narrative surrounding glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, which has faced scrutiny for its alleged health risks. The verdict, which emerged from Philadelphia’s court system, has sparked discussions among legal experts regarding the implications of the bifurcation within the judicial system. This division raises questions about jurisdiction and … Read more

Tesla Faces Backlash as Jury Rules Against Automaker in Key Largo Autopilot Fatality Case

by

In Key Largo, Florida, a jury delivered a substantial verdict against Tesla following a three-week trial concerning a deadly crash involving the company’s Autopilot feature. Plaintiff attorneys asserted that Tesla engaged in deceitful practices, withheld crucial information, and misled law enforcement to absolve itself of responsibility in the incident. The case centered around a fatal incident where a Tesla vehicle, operating on Autopilot, crashed while allegedly under the supervision of the automated system. During the trial, attorneys for the plaintiffs made a compelling case that Tesla’s maneuvers contributed to the jury’s unfavorable view of the … Read more

Federal Judge Probes Arguments in Controversial Removal Case for San Mateo County Sheriff

by

In San Francisco, a federal judge expressed skepticism regarding an attorney’s plea to halt an impending hearing aimed at removing San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus, who faces allegations of corruption. The hearing, set to begin on August 18, is part of an enforcement process under Measure A, an amendment approved by local voters earlier this year. During a session lasting about 30 minutes, Attorney Wilson Leung argued that the removal proceedings could infringe upon Corpus’s constitutional rights as an elected official, thereby causing her “irreparable harm.” His request to delay or cancel the hearing … Read more