Claims

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case on Violations of International Law

by

On a recent Friday, the Supreme Court announced its decision to hear a significant case that raises important questions about the application of international law within the United States legal framework. This case, known as Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I, concerns the extent to which private individuals can bring lawsuits under federal laws designed to address serious violations of international human rights. The implications of this case could have far-reaching effects on how international human rights violations are prosecuted and the responsibilities of U.S. companies operating abroad. Background of the Case The core of … Read more

No Tariff Opinion: An Overview of Recent Supreme Court Developments

by

The recent shifts in the Supreme Court’s schedule regarding opinion days have sparked considerable anticipation among legal experts and advocacy groups. With significant cases lined up for judgment, particularly those involving President Trump’s tariff policies, the legal community has been keenly observing the court’s actions. This heightened interest underscores the importance of the Supreme Court’s decisions on issues that could have far-reaching implications for both domestic and international policy. Recent Supreme Court Actions In a notable change, the Supreme Court has moved its non-argument day to the Friday preceding argument sessions. This alteration allows for … Read more

Justices seem receptive of private suits against investment companies

by

In a recent hearing regarding FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, the Supreme Court justices exhibited a surprising openness to allowing private parties to sue investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940. This case marks a significant moment as it challenges the traditional skepticism the Court has shown towards implied rights of action in previous decades. The justices’ consideration of the statute’s provisions suggests a potential shift in the legal landscape governing investment companies and their accountability. Arguments Presented Before the Court The arguments presented by Shay Dvoretzky, representing the … Read more

Text and History, Not History and Tradition

by

The interpretation of constitutional law often hinges on the principles of textualism and historical context. In debates surrounding the Second Amendment, a prevalent notion is that the Supreme Court employs a “history and tradition” test to adjudicate claims. However, this characterization can obscure the essential role of the text itself in constitutional interpretation. This discussion aims to clarify the distinction between relying solely on tradition versus a more balanced approach that incorporates both text and history. The Misconception of “History and Tradition” in Constitutional Interpretation Many legal scholars argue that the Supreme Court’s reliance on … Read more