Controversial

What James Madison Thought About AR-15s

by

The debate surrounding the Second Amendment and modern firearm technology often raises the question of how the founding fathers would interpret contemporary issues, such as the legality and regulation of AR-15 rifles. James Madison, known as the “Father of the Constitution,” played a pivotal role in drafting the Bill of Rights, which includes the Second Amendment. Understanding Madison’s views on arms and the context of his time can provide valuable insights into how modern firearms fit into the constitutional framework he helped create. The Historical Context of the Second Amendment When the Second Amendment was … Read more

Federal official challenges Trump administration’s power to fire her

by

In a significant legal challenge, Shira Perlmutter, the former head of the U.S. Copyright Office, has contested her dismissal by the Trump administration. Her case raises critical questions about the authority of the executive branch in personnel decisions and the interpretation of statutory provisions governing her position. The outcome of this case could have lasting implications for the balance of power within federal agencies. The Circumstances of Perlmutter’s Dismissal Shira Perlmutter was appointed to her role as the Register of Copyrights in 2020 by Carla Hayden, who was then the Librarian of Congress. This position … Read more

Court dubious of ICE contractor’s right to immediate appeal

by

The recent hearing in The GEO Group v. Menocal has raised significant questions about the rights of contractors operating under the auspices of government agencies, specifically in the context of immigration enforcement. As the case unfolds, it appears that the justices are leaning towards skepticism regarding the contractor’s entitlement to an immediate appeal. The implications of this case could have far-reaching effects on how government contractors operate, particularly those involved in controversial areas such as immigration detention. Background of the Case The GEO Group, a private contractor running an ICE detention facility, faces claims from … Read more

Justices Agree to Decide Major Election Law Case

by

In a pivotal moment for election law, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case that could redefine the parameters of ballot counting in federal elections. This case, known as Watson v. Republican National Committee, stems from a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day. The implications of this ruling could resonate across the United States, as similar laws exist in over 30 states and the District of Columbia. Background of the Case The dispute traces back … Read more