Court

Supreme Court to Address Key Issues in January

by

The Supreme Court is set to hear a series of significant cases starting January 12, 2026. Among the cases are those concerning transgender athletes, gun rights, and the controversial firing of a Federal Reserve governor by former President Donald Trump. These cases will not only shape legal precedents but also influence public policy and societal norms across the nation. Transgender Athletes and Sports Participation On January 13, the Court will hear arguments in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B. P. J., which challenge laws in Idaho and West Virginia that restrict transgender women … Read more

Borderlines, Benchslaps, and Burdens of Proof

by

The legal landscape surrounding immigration, federal authority, and the interpretation of statutes continues to evolve, particularly in light of recent Supreme Court cases. The discussions surrounding these cases often highlight the delicate balance between state and federal powers, as well as the implications of judicial interpretations on policy and individual rights. Understanding these nuances is essential for comprehending how borderlines, both literal and figurative, shape the legal framework within which these cases operate. Borderlines in Immigration Law The Immigration and Nationality Act stipulates that an alien who “arrives in the United States” can apply for … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Wednesday, November 12

by

On November 12, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is poised to address several significant cases and issues that have caught the attention of legal scholars and the public alike. This date marks a continuation of the court’s busy schedule, as it deliberates on matters that could have far-reaching implications for American law and society. The court’s decisions not only shape the legal landscape but also reflect the evolving values and priorities of the nation. Key Developments in SCOTUS One of the notable aspects of the court’s current session is its consideration of … Read more

Making Sense of the Emergency Appropriations Decisions

by

The recent decisions regarding emergency appropriations have underscored a significant shift in the relationship between executive power and legislative spending authority. This phenomenon, termed “appropriations presidentialism,” has gained traction during the second Trump Administration, prompting a series of legal challenges that culminated in critical rulings by the Supreme Court. These rulings, while thinly reasoned, are poised to influence future appropriations litigation and clarify the boundaries of executive spending authority. Overview of the Current Appropriations Landscape The appropriations landscape in the United States has become increasingly complex, particularly in light of recent legal disputes involving executive … Read more