Court

Challenging Politically Discriminatory Funding Cuts

by

In recent years, the political landscape in the United States has witnessed an alarming trend where federal funding is increasingly being used as a tool for political discrimination. The Trump Administration’s approach to withholding federal funds from certain states and cities, particularly those labeled as “sanctuary jurisdictions,” raises significant legal and ethical questions. This tactic, often employed to enforce compliance with federal immigration policies, has sparked a series of legal challenges that delve into the constitutional implications of such actions. Legal Framework Surrounding Funding Cuts The legal arguments against the President’s unilateral funding cuts primarily … Read more

Supreme Court further closes the prison gates

by

The recent decision by the Supreme Court to deny Danny Howell’s petition for review has raised significant concerns regarding access to justice for incarcerated individuals. In a move that goes beyond simply dismissing Howell’s request, the Court has implemented a policy that restricts future noncriminal petitions filed in forma pauperis. This decision, which has been described as a “Martin-izing” of petitioners, has profound implications for those unable to afford the substantial costs associated with filing in the Supreme Court. Understanding the Implications of the Court’s Decision Filing a petition in the Supreme Court is not … Read more

Supreme Court Further Closes the Prison Gates

by

On January 20, 2023, the Supreme Court took a significant step that may have far-reaching implications for access to justice, particularly for incarcerated individuals. In a routine order, the Court dismissed a petition from Danny Howell, denying his request to file without paying court fees due to financial hardship. However, the Court’s decision did not stop there; it also barred Howell from filing any future noncriminal petitions in forma pauperis, a move that has drawn criticism from legal experts and advocates alike. Implications of the Court’s Decision Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed her dissent against … Read more

The Footnote That Broke Constitutional Law

by

The intersection of law and commerce has often been fraught with tension, particularly when economic interests clash with regulatory frameworks. A pivotal moment in this ongoing struggle occurred during the Great Depression, when a product called Milnut challenged the traditional dairy industry. This case not only highlighted the complexities of federal regulation but also led to a landmark Supreme Court decision, notable for a footnote that would reshape constitutional law in ways that continue to resonate today. The Filled Milk Act: A Legislative Response The Filled Milk Act, enacted in response to the emergence of … Read more