Court

Federal Court Rules Against Technology Vendor, Orders $20 Million in Restitution for Fraudulent Misrepresentation to Fort Collins

by

Fort Collins, Colorado—A federal appeals court has upheld a jury’s decision that a technology vendor misled the city in its attempts to secure a contract, ultimately ordering the company to pay nearly $20 million. The ruling follows a protracted legal battle after Fort Collins voters approved municipal broadband in 2017, leading the city to seek a provider for a utility billing system to support its new Internet services. In selecting Open International, LLC as the vendor, Fort Collins soon encountered disputes over responsibility for missed deadlines. Open claimed the city hampered progress by not providing … Read more

"Chaos at San Francisco Immigration Court: Asylum-Seekers Arrested Amid Controversial ICE Tactics"

by

San Francisco, California — Tensions ran high Thursday morning at the San Francisco immigration court as three asylum-seekers were arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers after attending routine hearings. Among them was an individual whom a judge indicated might have mental impairments, highlighting concerns regarding the treatment of vulnerable migrants within the immigration system. The arrests took place at 630 Sansome Street, a location that also houses an ICE field office. This incident was part of a troubling trend, with reports indicating that over 30 individuals have been detained by federal agents immediately … Read more

Federal Court Halts Key Iowa Pharmacy Law, Citing First Amendment and ERISA Violations

by

Des Moines, Iowa — A federal court has temporarily blocked the enforcement of significant elements of a new state law designed to regulate pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and health plans in Iowa. On July 21, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa issued a preliminary injunction, citing potential conflicts with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the First Amendment’s protection of commercial speech. This ruling follows a temporary restraining order issued by the court on June 30, a day before the law was set to take effect. … Read more

California Appeals Court Declares Ammunition Background Check Law Unconstitutional in Landmark Ruling

by

SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court has ruled that a California law mandating background checks for ammunition purchases infringes upon the Second Amendment rights of individuals. The decision, issued by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, marks a significant legal development in the ongoing debate over gun control in the state. The law, which took effect in 2016, required any buyer of ammunition to undergo a background check similar to those required for firearms purchases. Supporters of the measure argued that it aimed to reduce gun violence by ensuring that only lawful individuals … Read more