Court

Jury Rules in Favor of Whistleblower: San Diego Court Awards $3 Million to Former Orange County Prosecutor in Harassment Case Against DA Todd Spitzer

by

SAN DIEGO — A jury in San Diego County has concluded that a former high-ranking prosecutor from Orange County was compelled to retire due to harassment orchestrated by the county’s District Attorney, Todd Spitzer, and his first assistant, Shawn Nelson, who currently serves as a Superior Court judge. Tracy Miller, who had spent 25 years in the Orange County District Attorney’s office, filed a whistleblower retaliation and harassment lawsuit after her retirement. The jury awarded her $3 million in economic damages and an additional $25,000 in punitive damages specifically against Spitzer, while finding that Nelson … Read more

Former Detective’s Surrender Update: Attorney Claims Court Bond is ‘Painfully Absurd’ as Client Remains at Large

by

TROY, Mo. — A former Lincoln County detective remains at large despite his attorney’s assurances that he would surrender to authorities on felony charges related to a high-profile murder trial. Michael Merkel, 44, is facing two Class A felony counts of perjury tied to the controversial conviction of Russ Faria in the murder of Betsy Faria. Merkel’s attorney, Joel Eisenstein, had repeatedly informed the court that his client would turn himself in on Thursday morning. As of that evening, however, prosecutors confirmed Merkel had not complied. The Journal has uncovered that Merkel is no longer … Read more

SEC Triumphs as Court Rejects Challenge to Stricter Shareholder Proposal Regulations

by

In Washington, D.C., federal regulators have successfully dismissed a lawsuit that sought to challenge new rules governing shareholder proposals. This decision marks a significant moment for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as it seeks to tighten guidelines for how investors can raise issues at company meetings. The SEC’s updated regulations, implemented last year, aim to streamline the process of submitting shareholder proposals. These changes are intended to enhance transparency and efficiency, allowing companies to manage proposals more effectively while ensuring that only serious matters are brought to vote. The litigation arose when a coalition … Read more

Federal Appeals Court Sides with NASCAR, Vacates Injunction in High-Profile Antitrust Case Involving Michael Jordan’s Racing Team

by

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A federal appellate court has sided with NASCAR in an ongoing antitrust case involving two race teams, one owned by basketball legend Michael Jordan. A three-judge panel vacated an injunction that required the teams, 23XI and Front Row Motorsports, to be recognized as chartered entities while their legal dispute progresses. The two teams filed suit against NASCAR late last year after they opted not to endorse renewed charter agreements. NASCAR’s charter system, akin to franchise agreements in various sports, allows charters to be revoked and are subject to expiration. While 13 other … Read more