Election

Redistricting Cases Head for Rock Bottom

by

The landscape of redistricting law has become increasingly complex and contentious, particularly following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause. This decision has effectively removed the federal judiciary from the equation regarding partisan gerrymandering, leaving states to navigate their own redistricting processes. As various cases emerge, it is evident that the implications of this ruling are far-reaching, affecting not only the political balance in Congress but also the fundamental principles of democracy and representation. Impact of the Supreme Court’s Ruling The Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause has been a … Read more

Redistricting Cases Head for Rock Bottom

by

The complex landscape of redistricting law has reached a critical juncture, particularly following the Supreme Court’s decision in Rucho v. Common Cause. This ruling declared that federal courts lack the authority to intervene in matters of partisan gerrymandering, leading to a proliferation of contentious redistricting cases across the United States. As states rush to redraw their electoral maps, the implications of this judicial abdication have become increasingly evident, often resulting in maps that favor one political party over another. The Aftermath of Rucho v. Common Cause The Rucho decision has left many wondering about the … Read more

Bush v. Gore in Retrospect

by

The Supreme Court case Bush v. Gore, decided on December 12, 2000, marked a pivotal moment in American electoral politics. The decision effectively resolved one of the most contentious presidential elections in U.S. history, raising questions about judicial impartiality and the role of the judiciary in electoral processes. As we reflect on the case 25 years later, its implications extend beyond the courtroom, influencing public perception of the Supreme Court and its decisions. The Background of Bush v. Gore The events leading to Bush v. Gore began during the presidential election on November 7, 2000. … Read more

Supreme Court Difficult to Read in Case on Campaign Finance Limitations

by

The recent proceedings of the Supreme Court have brought to light significant challenges surrounding campaign finance limitations. The case, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, involves a dispute over federal laws that restrict the amount of money political parties can spend in coordination with candidates. As the justices deliberated, the atmosphere was charged with questions regarding the balance between free speech and regulatory measures in electoral politics. Context of the Case During the oral arguments, which lasted over two hours, various justices expressed sympathy towards the challengers’ stance that these expenditure limits infringe … Read more