Election

Challengers to Texas Redistricting Map Urge Justices to Strike It as Racially Discriminatory

by

Civil rights groups and Texas residents have raised significant concerns regarding the new congressional map adopted by the Texas Legislature in August. They argue that this map is racially discriminatory and violates the Constitution’s equal protection clause. The challengers, including the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, have urged the Supreme Court to uphold a ruling from a three-judge district court that prohibited the state from using the map in the upcoming 2026 elections. Background of the Redistricting Controversy The dispute over the Texas congressional map has its roots in a directive from President Donald Trump, who … Read more

Challengers to Texas Redistricting Map Urge Justices to Strike It as Racially Discriminatory

by

Civil rights groups and various Texans are contesting the new congressional map adopted by the Texas Legislature in August, arguing that it violates the principles of racial equality and fair representation. The challengers, including the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, have urged the Supreme Court to restore a prior ruling by a three-judge district court that prohibited the state from implementing the map for the upcoming 2026 elections. This legal battle underscores the ongoing tensions surrounding redistricting practices and their implications for minority representation in Texas. Background on the Redistricting Controversy The controversy began when former … Read more

Texas Appeals to Supreme Court for Redistricting Map Approval

by

On a recent Friday, Texas made a significant move by appealing to the Supreme Court, seeking permission to implement a congressional redistricting map that had been previously deemed racially discriminatory by a lower court. The urgency of this request arises from a decision made by a three-judge district court in Texas, which ruled against the map’s use for the upcoming 2026 elections. This ruling was based on the conclusion that the map unconstitutionally sorts voters based on race, raising concerns about its implications for electoral fairness. Legal Background and Current Status Texas Solicitor General William … Read more

SCOTUS Today for Wednesday, November 19

by

On this day in 1794, representatives of the United States and Great Britain signed Jay’s Treaty, named after John Jay, the first chief justice of the Supreme Court. This treaty aimed to maintain peace between the two nations, as tensions lingered more than a decade after the conclusion of the Revolutionary War. The historical significance of this event is underscored by the ongoing role of the Supreme Court in shaping American law and governance. SCOTUS Quick Hits As the Supreme Court continues its vital work, a number of significant developments are on the docket. The … Read more