Election

Originalism’s Campaign Finance Conundrum

by

The intersection of originalism and campaign finance presents a complex legal and philosophical dilemma for the Supreme Court. At the heart of this issue lies the tension between historical interpretation of constitutional principles and contemporary understandings of political finance. As originalism gains traction among justices, particularly with cases like campaign finance limitations, its implications for existing precedents warrant careful examination. the historical context of campaign finance the supreme court's interpretation of campaign finance began to take shape in the 1970s amid rising concerns over the influence of money in politics. congress responded to these concerns … Read more

SCOTUS Today: December 9, 2023

by

On December 9, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is poised to deliberate on significant legal issues that could reshape the balance of power within the federal government. This date is historically relevant, marking 25 years since the Supreme Court intervened in the contentious 2000 presidential election by halting the recount in Florida. The case, which pitted then-candidate George W. Bush against Vice President Al Gore, set a precedent for the Court’s involvement in electoral disputes. As the current Court hears arguments, the implications of its decisions may resonate through the political … Read more

The Who’s and What’s of Presidential Power

by

The concept of presidential power in the United States is a complex and multifaceted issue that has evolved significantly over the years. This power encompasses various aspects of governance, including the authority to enact legislation, command the military, and manage foreign relations. The interpretation and scope of this power are often subject to judicial review, particularly in cases that challenge the boundaries of executive authority. As the nation navigates through contemporary political landscapes, understanding the nuances of presidential power becomes increasingly important. Understanding Presidential Authority Presidential power is derived from the Constitution, specifically Article II, … Read more

Supreme Court Allows Texas to Use Redistricting Map Challenged as Racially Discriminatory

by

On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued a significant ruling allowing Texas to proceed with its new congressional redistricting map, which has faced allegations of racial discrimination. This decision comes in light of a previous ruling from a three-judge district court in El Paso, which found the map unconstitutional due to its alleged manipulation of voter demographics based on race. The court’s brief, unsigned opinion has granted Texas a reprieve, enabling the state to utilize the contested map in the upcoming 2026 elections. Background of the Redistricting Controversy The controversy surrounding Texas’s redistricting map stems from … Read more