Federal

Supreme Court Sends Dispute on HIV Disability Claim Back to Lower Court

by

The Supreme Court recently made significant rulings regarding two distinct legal cases, one involving a disability claim related to HIV and the other concerning the definition of “reasonable doubt” in criminal trials. In the first case, the high court addressed the appeal of a Louisiana man who claimed he was denied access to a physical therapy clinic due to his HIV status. This ruling has potential implications for how federal disability laws are interpreted in relation to state laws, particularly during public health emergencies. Case Overview: Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy In Doe v. Dynamic … Read more

Originalism’s Campaign Finance Conundrum

by

The intersection of originalism and campaign finance presents a complex legal and philosophical dilemma for the Supreme Court. At the heart of this issue lies the tension between historical interpretation of constitutional principles and contemporary understandings of political finance. As originalism gains traction among justices, particularly with cases like campaign finance limitations, its implications for existing precedents warrant careful examination. the historical context of campaign finance the supreme court's interpretation of campaign finance began to take shape in the 1970s amid rising concerns over the influence of money in politics. congress responded to these concerns … Read more

SCOTUS Today: December 9, 2023

by

On December 9, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is poised to deliberate on significant legal issues that could reshape the balance of power within the federal government. This date is historically relevant, marking 25 years since the Supreme Court intervened in the contentious 2000 presidential election by halting the recount in Florida. The case, which pitted then-candidate George W. Bush against Vice President Al Gore, set a precedent for the Court’s involvement in electoral disputes. As the current Court hears arguments, the implications of its decisions may resonate through the political … Read more

Court Seems Likely to Side with Trump on President’s Power to Fire FTC Commissioner

by

The ongoing legal battle surrounding the president’s authority to dismiss Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioners has drawn significant attention, especially as the Supreme Court appears poised to make a pivotal ruling. The case, Trump v. Slaughter, involves a challenge to a federal law that limits the president’s power to fire FTC commissioners, allowing removal only for specific reasons such as inefficiency or malfeasance. As the arguments unfolded, it became evident that a majority of justices may support the Trump administration’s stance, which could reshape the balance of power within federal agencies. Legal Background and Implications … Read more