California Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants Over Mental Health Claims to Proceed

A California state judge ruled on Monday against a motion from Meta Platforms, Snap, and TikTok to dismiss a lawsuit claiming that the companies negatively impact users’ mental health. The case, part of consolidated litigation, argues that social media platforms should be held accountable for their influence on mental well-being. The lawsuit centers on whether the plaintiff should have been aware of the potential injuries caused by the companies’ platforms before taking legal action. The judge stated that this aspect of the case is suitable for a jury’s consideration, emphasizing that the merits of the … Read more

Collin County Jury Delivers Resounding $359K Verdict, Signaling Triumph for Injured Texas Driver Against Insurance Giants

In Plano, Texas, a recent jury decision underscored the importance of standing firm against inadequate insurance settlements. A verdict of $359,199.70 was awarded to a local resident who sustained injuries from a crash at an intersection in October 2023, showcasing a strong commitment from the judicial system to support victims. The jury’s ruling came after the defense argued that the plaintiff had not adequately proven her case and thus deserved no compensation—a claim that was decisively rejected. The incident occurred when the plaintiff was driving through the intersection of Parker and Clark, and the defendant … Read more

Judge Slashes Baltimore’s $266 Million Verdict Against Drug Giants, Citing Excessive Damages in Opioid Case

BALTIMORE — A judge has determined that jurors significantly overstepped in their financial award to the city in a major drug-related case against two pharmaceutical giants. Following a verdict last November that held McKesson and AmerisourceBergen accountable for exacerbating Baltimore’s opioid crisis, the presiding judge suggested modifying the initial damages awarded from $266 million to just $52 million. Baltimore City Circuit Judge Lawrence Fletcher-Hill ruled that the jurors’ decision was “grossly excessive” and prompted concern, stating that the initial verdict was “shocking” given the presented evidence. The case centered around claims that the companies had … Read more

New Class-Action Lawsuit Challenges Real Estate Giants Over Alleged Commission Conspiracy Impacting Homebuyers

CHICAGO — A lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court by homebuyer Matt Cwynar against several real estate brokers, accusing them of conspiring to maintain inflated commission rates in the buyer-agent market. The National Association of Realtors (NAR) is not named as a defendant but is implicated as a co-conspirator alongside affiliated brokerages and multiple local MLSs. The complaint outlines allegations that brokers collaborated to enact anti-competitive practices that artificially raised commission fees, resulting in higher costs for consumers across Illinois and other states. Cwynar contends that prior to recent changes in NAR policies, … Read more