Lawsuit

Judiciary To Remain Open Until Feb. 5

by

In a recent announcement, the Judiciary confirmed its commitment to remaining operational until February 5, despite potential funding challenges. This decision comes in light of the impending lapse in appropriations set for January 30, which could affect various federal operations. The Judiciary has outlined its plans to utilize existing court fee balances and other non-appropriation dependent funds to maintain its essential functions and services during this period. Operational Continuity Amid Funding Uncertainty The Judiciary will continue its paid operations through February 4, ensuring that most proceedings and deadlines will proceed as scheduled. However, there may … Read more

Supreme Court to Hear Birthright Citizenship Case on April 1

by

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on April 1 regarding a significant challenge to the concept of birthright citizenship in the United States. This case arises from an executive order issued by former President Donald Trump, which aimed to end the automatic granting of citizenship to children born in the country to non-citizen parents. The implications of this case are profound, as they touch upon constitutional rights and the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has historically guaranteed citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil. Background of the Case The legal … Read more

The Supreme Court’s Upcoming Term: An Overview of Selected Cases

by

The Supreme Court has set the stage for its current term, having recently finalized the list of cases it will hear. Among these cases is the notable Salazar v. Paramount Global, which addresses the interpretation of a federal law from 1988 aimed at safeguarding videotape rental histories from public exposure. The court’s decision to include this case has generated significant interest, particularly since it did not outline an expedited schedule for arguments, suggesting the court may have reached its limit for this term. Current Docket and Case Selection As of now, the Supreme Court’s oral … Read more

California’s Congressional Map Controversy: A Legal Battle

by

California’s recent legal maneuvers surrounding its congressional map have drawn significant attention, particularly as they aim to counter Republican advantages in Texas. The state’s lawyers presented arguments to the Supreme Court emphasizing the importance of maintaining a new map designed to secure five additional seats for Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. This legal battle highlights the ongoing struggle between political parties to influence congressional representation through redistricting. The Context of Redistricting in California Redistricting is a critical process that typically occurs every ten years, following the completion of the census. In California, the … Read more