Lawsuit

Justices Agree to Decide Major Election Law Case

by

In a pivotal moment for election law, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case that could redefine the parameters of ballot counting in federal elections. This case, known as Watson v. Republican National Committee, stems from a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted if they are received within five business days after Election Day. The implications of this ruling could resonate across the United States, as similar laws exist in over 30 states and the District of Columbia. Background of the Case The dispute traces back … Read more

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case on Constitutionality of Same-Sex Marriage

by

The recent decision by the Supreme Court to decline a request for reconsideration of its 2015 ruling on same-sex marriage has significant implications for the ongoing debate surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. This decision stemmed from a case involving Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky, who had previously refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The refusal led to legal challenges that ultimately questioned the constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Background of the Case The controversy began after the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which established a … Read more

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Intervention on SNAP Funding

by

In a significant legal maneuver, the Trump administration has requested the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and pause a ruling made by a federal judge in Rhode Island concerning the funding of the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) for November. This request comes in light of a recent order from U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell, Jr., which mandates that the government allocate $4 billion to ensure the full funding of SNAP. The Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, criticized the ruling as an unprecedented challenge to the separation of powers, arguing that the crisis resulting … Read more

Court to Consider Prison Inmate’s Religious Liberty Claims

by

On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Damon Landor, a Louisiana man whose religious beliefs led him to grow long dreadlocks. The case raises significant questions regarding the balance between institutional authority and individual rights, particularly in the context of religious expression within the prison system. Landor’s situation began in 2020 when prison officials forcibly shaved his head, disregarding a federal appeals court ruling that affirmed his right to maintain his dreadlocks. The Legal Framework: RLUIPA At the heart of this case is the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized … Read more