Rulemaking

Exploring Potential Mass Tort Litigation: Depo-Provera Cases and Rulemaking Committee’s Role in Legal Funding Decisions

by

Depo-Provera, a long-used injectable contraceptive, is stepping into the legal spotlight as concerns about its potential health risks might bring a wave of litigation, identifying it as a possible new mass tort scenario. Legal experts are debating the implications, considering previous lawsuits that claimed insufficient warning about bone density loss associated with the drug’s prolonged use. With these discussions underway, a committee on judicial proceedings may soon evaluate how litigation funding can influence such lawsuits. The issue of third-party financing in the legal system is contentious, raising questions about the impact on case outcomes and … Read more

Supreme Court Ends Chevron Deference, Restoring Court Oversight Over Administrative Agencies’ Rulemaking Authority

by

Washington, D.C. – In a historic reversal, the Supreme Wells vented a 40-year-old legal standard that shaped the review of federal agency powers, sparking intense reactions across the United States. The Supreme Court decision dismantles the Chevron Deference, a doctrine relied upon since 1984, which broadly allowed government agencies to interpret ambiguous laws where Congress had not defined clear guidelines. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., a ruling from nearly four decades ago, set a precedent giving agencies leeway to make interpretive decisions on statutes within their jurisdiction, provided they were reasonable. … Read more