Federal

Supreme Court Takes Up New Cases on Geofence Warrants and Roundup Weedkiller

by

The Supreme Court has recently added four new cases to its Oral Argument Docket for the 2025-26 term, covering a broad spectrum of legal issues, including Fourth Amendment rights and federal preemption. This announcement, made after the justices’ private conference, highlights the court’s ongoing engagement with significant legal questions that could have far-reaching implications. Among these cases is a critical examination of geofence warrants, which has raised substantial concerns regarding privacy and law enforcement practices. Geofence Warrants: A Constitutional Challenge One of the primary cases the Supreme Court will address is Chatrie v. United States, … Read more

Executive Preemption and the Dormant Commerce Clause After Pataki and Paxton

by

The legal landscape surrounding executive preemption and the dormant commerce clause has evolved significantly following landmark cases such as Pataki and Paxton. These cases illuminate the complexities of federal and state interactions, particularly in the context of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). The recent executive order issued by President Trump has raised questions about the balance of power between state regulations and federal authority, particularly regarding the implications for interstate commerce. The Executive Order and Its Implications In December 2025, President Trump signed an executive order that directed the Department of Justice to challenge … Read more

Justices wrestle with what, exactly, New Jersey Transit is

by

The Supreme Court recently engaged in a challenging debate regarding the legal status of New Jersey Transit Corporation and its susceptibility to lawsuits in states outside New Jersey. This case raises significant questions about the nature of public transit agencies and their relationship with state sovereignty, particularly in the context of interstate operations. The arguments presented highlight the complexities involved in determining whether New Jersey Transit functions more like a state agency or a private entity. The Legal Context of New Jersey Transit New Jersey Transit, established by the New Jersey Legislature over four decades … Read more

Oral Argument Live Blog for Wednesday, January 21

by

On Wednesday, January 21, the Supreme Court will convene to hear oral arguments in the significant case of Trump v. Cook. This case revolves around President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. As the arguments unfold, we will provide live updates and insights into the proceedings, reflecting the complexity and implications of this high-profile legal battle. Case Background The case of Trump v. Cook has garnered considerable attention due to its potential impact on the independence of federal agencies. Lisa Cook, who has been … Read more