Justice

Court Unanimously Holds that Double Jeopardy Bars Convictions for Two Firearm Offenses

by

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of double jeopardy in the case of Barrett v. United States. This decision clarifies the application of the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, particularly in relation to firearm offenses under federal law. The ruling emphasizes the importance of legislative intent when determining whether multiple convictions can arise from a single act that violates closely related statutes. Understanding the Double Jeopardy Clause The double jeopardy clause, found in the Fifth Amendment, protects individuals from being tried or punished for the same offense more than once. In … Read more

The Fed-firing case in three steps

by

The case surrounding President Donald Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is a significant legal matter that raises complex questions about executive power and administrative law. This situation not only has implications for the Federal Reserve but also for the broader financial markets and governance in the United States. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear this case, the stakes are high, and the outcome could reshape the boundaries of presidential authority. Background of the Case The conflict between Trump and Cook began in August when Cook was removed from her position, … Read more

Executive Preemption and the Dormant Commerce Clause After Pataki and Paxton

by

The legal landscape surrounding executive preemption and the dormant commerce clause has evolved significantly following landmark cases such as Pataki and Paxton. These cases illuminate the complexities of federal and state interactions, particularly in the context of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). The recent executive order issued by President Trump has raised questions about the balance of power between state regulations and federal authority, particularly regarding the implications for interstate commerce. The Executive Order and Its Implications In December 2025, President Trump signed an executive order that directed the Department of Justice to challenge … Read more

Justices wrestle with what, exactly, New Jersey Transit is

by

The Supreme Court recently engaged in a challenging debate regarding the legal status of New Jersey Transit Corporation and its susceptibility to lawsuits in states outside New Jersey. This case raises significant questions about the nature of public transit agencies and their relationship with state sovereignty, particularly in the context of interstate operations. The arguments presented highlight the complexities involved in determining whether New Jersey Transit functions more like a state agency or a private entity. The Legal Context of New Jersey Transit New Jersey Transit, established by the New Jersey Legislature over four decades … Read more