Justice

Justices Reject State Limits on Malpractice Actions for Cases in Federal Court

by

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court regarding medical malpractice litigation has significant implications for how such cases will be handled in federal courts. In a unanimous decision, the justices addressed the limitations imposed by state laws, particularly those of Delaware, which required specific procedural steps before a malpractice suit could proceed. The case of Berk v. Choy highlights the tension between state-imposed requirements and federal procedural standards, as the justices sought to clarify the applicability of state law in federal courts. Background of the Case Harold Berk’s legal battle began after a series of … Read more

Justices Clarify Restitution Requirements for Federal Convicts

by

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court addressed the implications of the ex post facto clause in relation to restitution obligations under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA). The case, Ellingburg v. United States, centered on whether the requirement for Holsey Ellingburg to pay restitution could be altered retroactively after the commission of his crimes but before his sentencing. The unanimous opinion, delivered by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, underscored the constitutional protections against retroactive increases in punishment, establishing a clear boundary for federal criminal proceedings. Understanding the Ex Post Facto Clause The ex post facto clause … Read more

SCOTUS today for Wednesday, January 21

by

This morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a significant case concerning President Donald Trump’s decision to terminate Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The case has garnered considerable attention due to its implications for executive power and the independence of federal agencies. As the hearing unfolds, we will provide live updates starting at 9:30 a.m. EST, allowing legal experts and the public to engage with the proceedings in real-time. Latest Opinions from the Court On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court released opinions on three argued cases: Berk v. Choy, Ellingburg v. United States, and … Read more

Supreme Court Denies Review in Several Gun Cases

by

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to deny review in several significant gun-related cases has sparked discussions among legal experts and advocates alike. This decision reflects the court’s ongoing approach to Second Amendment issues, particularly concerning the rights of individuals with felony convictions. The implications of these rulings could have far-reaching effects on gun laws across the United States. Overview of the Denied Cases On a Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court declined to review four petitions challenging the ban on firearm possession for individuals previously convicted of felonies. The cases in question included Zherka v. Bondi, … Read more