NIH

Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to Uphold Controversial NIH Grant Cuts Amid Legal Challenges

by

Washington, D.C. — The Trump administration is escalating its legal battle over grant funding issued by the National Institutes of Health, seeking to finalize significant reductions in research financing that it contends supports activities in violation of federal policies on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). On Thursday, officials requested that the Supreme Court grant them the authority to implement these cuts. Shortly after taking office, President Donald Trump initiated substantial cuts to research grants, particularly targeting projects related to gender identity and DEI that he alleged contravened his executive orders. By early April, a coalition … Read more

Judge Overturns Controversial Trump-Era NIH Grant Cuts, Reinstating Funding for Vital Research Areas

by

Washington — A federal judge has invalidated several directives from the Trump administration that led to the cancellation of numerous National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants. Many of these funded research on critical topics such as diversity, gender identity, and vaccine skepticism. Dr. Peter Lurie, head of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, remarked that the orders to terminate grants linked to “DEI”—diversity, equity, and inclusion—were found to be both arbitrary and unlawful. His organization was one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging the administration’s actions. The ruling was issued by … Read more

Federal Judge Compels NIH to Reinstate Diversity Research Grants, Igniting New Conversations on Equity in Science

by

A federal judge in Washington ordered the National Institutes of Health to reinstate a set of research grants focused on enhancing diversity within the biomedical field. The verdict emerged from a dispute over funding allocations intended for projects that promote inclusivity and broaden participation in health research. The controversy traces back to the NIH’s decision to cut funding for certain grants that aimed to support underrepresented groups in scientific research. Critics of this move argued that the decision undermined efforts to create a more equitable environment in the research community. The NIH had justified its … Read more

Federal Judge Halts NIH Plan to Cap Research Funding, Citing Potential Loss of Lives and Scientific Progress

by

Boston, MA — A federal judge in Massachusetts has halted the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) controversial plan to slash the reimbursement for indirect costs on grants, which institutions argued could decimate vital scientific research and lead to significant job losses. The cap was set to reduce these reimbursements to only 15 percent of direct research costs, a sharp decline from the current average of 28 percent. These indirect costs, crucial for labs and facilities maintenance, among others, are fundamental to the daily operational needs of research. The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Angel … Read more