Supreme

Texas Supreme Court Sheds Light on Challenges of Determining Damages, Calls for Reasoned Decision-Making by Juries

by

HOUSTON, TEXAS – Last summer, the Texas Supreme Court made a landmark decision to reverse a $15 million jury award in the case of Gregory v. Chohan. The court criticized the plaintiffs’ counsel for failing to provide a rational argument justifying the amount sought or awarded. This case sheds light on the need for juries to be guided in their deliberations and avoid arbitrary methods when determining damages. In civil cases, damages serve two essential purposes: compensating the injured party for their harm and deterring similar wrongful conduct in the future. However, different jurisdictions have … Read more

Landmark Decision: Maine’s Supreme Court Rejects Appeal over Trump’s Ballot Status

by

AUGUSTA, Maine — The highest court in Maine has ruled to dismiss an appeal challenging a judge’s decision regarding President Donald Trump’s ballot status. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court’s rejection on the matter concludes ongoing legal proceedings that questioned whether Trump’s name should appear on the state’s voting ballot. The controversy arose when Independent candidate Terry Hayes filed a lawsuit against Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap. Hayes claimed that Trump did not meet the constitutional requirements to be on the ballot as a nominee of the Republican Party. However, the court ultimately sided with Dunlap, … Read more

Supreme Court Case Threatens to Drastically Reduce Federal Regulatory Power in Environmental and Healthcare Sectors

by

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Jan. 17, 2024, in two cases that could have far-reaching implications for federal regulatory power. The cases, Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. vs. Department of Commerce, focus on fisheries management but carry implications for broader federal enforcement of environmental and health care regulations. The central question in these cases is whether the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service, has the authority to require commercial fishers to pay for onboard observers on fishing voyages, as mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery … Read more

Supreme Court Reduces Sentence in Contempt of Court Case Against Delhi Lawyer Over Judges’ Remarks

by

New Delhi, India – The Indian Supreme Court (SC) has reduced the sentence of a lawyer, Virendra Singh, in a criminal contempt case. The lawyer had made derogatory remarks against judges of the Delhi High Court (DHC). Originally convicted and sentenced to six months in prison and a fine of 2,000 rupees by the DHC, the SC decided to reduce the sentence based on the lawyer’s apology and the period he had already served. In July 2022, Singh filed a plea accusing the DHC judges of acting arbitrarily and favoring the accused illegally. He also … Read more