Jury Deliberates Fate of Defendant in Smith County Deputy’s Death Case

TYLER, Texas – The jury is currently deliberating in the case of Daniel Nyabuto versus the State of Texas. Nyabuto is facing the charge of intoxicated manslaughter, accused of causing the death of a peace officer. During his trial, which spanned eight days, Nyabuto pleaded not guilty to the charge. The jury was initially released on December 15 but reconvened on January 9 for closing arguments and deliberations. Prosecutors allege that Nyabuto was driving under the influence when he rear-ended a patrol unit, resulting in the death of Smith County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Lorenzo Bustos. … Read more

Ohio Judge Halts Enforcement of Parental Consent Law, Protecting Social Media Access for Minors

CINCINNATI, Ohio – A judge has issued a temporary block on a new Ohio law requiring parental consent for minors to use social media platforms. The decision comes amid ongoing debate over the regulation of online activities for young people. The legislation, known as House Bill 33, was set to go into effect on July 1st, but Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Charles Kubicki Jr. halted its implementation pending further legal review. The law would have required individuals under the age of 18 to obtain parental consent in order to create and maintain accounts on … Read more

Landmark Ruling: Fourth Circuit Determines Indictment Not Considered a ‘Claim’ Under Lawyer’s Liability Policy

Columbia, MD – In a recent decision, the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of Wiley’s clients, stating that a federal indictment with a criminal forfeiture allegation does not qualify as a “claim” under a law firm’s professional liability policy. The court argued that a forfeiture allegation does not meet the requirements of a “written demand” as outlined in the policy’s definition of a claim. The case involved an insured attorney who sought coverage for a Department of Justice subpoena and subsequent criminal indictment. The indictment charged the attorney with conspiracy, money laundering, and forfeiture related … Read more

Federal Judges Question Trump’s Claim of Immunity in Election Subversion Lawsuit

WASHINGTON – In a high-profile case that could have significant implications for future elections, judges expressed skepticism regarding former President Donald Trump’s claim of immunity. The case involves allegations of election subversion during the 2020 election. The hearing took place on Monday at a federal court in Washington, D.C. During the proceedings, the judges scrutinized the argument put forward by Trump’s legal team, which asserts that the former president is immune from legal action due to the official duties he carried out while in office. The judges questioned whether such immunity extends to actions that … Read more