Supreme

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg Challenges Supreme Court’s Immunity Stance, Continues Prosecution in Trump’s Hush Money Case

by

New York — In a significant legal development, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has made a bold move in the criminal case against former President Donald Trump involving hush money payments. This follows a recent Supreme Court decision that broadly outlined presidential immunity, particularly distinguishing between official acts of the presidency and private conduct. Nearly a month after the high court’s decision, which was decided by a 6-3 margin, legal analysts have been scrutinizing the nuances of the ruling. The Supreme Court clarified that while presidents hold immunity for their official acts, this shield does … Read more

Supreme Court Restricts Nonconsensual Releases in Chapter 11 Bankruptcies, Impacting Mass Tort Litigation

by

Washington, D.C. – In a significant ruling that may transform the landscape of bankruptcy law, the U.S. Supreme Court has decisively limited the use of “nonconsensual third-party releases” in chapter 11 reorganization plans. This decision, falling on a narrow 5-4 margin, rejected these provisions, which previously allowed for the involuntary release of claims against nondebtors, such as the controversial inclusion of the Sackler family in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy case. Delivering the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, articulated that such releases improperly … Read more

Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision Revolutionizes Estate Planning Landscape

by

Washington, D.C. – A recent Supreme Court decision has significantly altered the landscape of estate planning, bringing attention to the complexities and legal intricacies faced by estate planners and individuals planning their legacies. The case, known as the Loper Bright decision, has set a precedent that emphasizes the need for comprehensive legal understanding while crafting an estate plan. The Supreme Court’s ruling addresses a previously ambiguous aspect of estate law which can affect how estates are handled across various states. Legal experts suggest that this case may lead to an increase in the utilization of … Read more

Federal Judge Upholds Noncompete Ban, Paving the Way for Supreme Court Battle

by

WASHINGTON — A federal judge recently ruled against a request to temporarily block enforcement of a sweeping new regulation that prohibits the use of noncompete clauses nationwide, setting the stage for a potential battle that could reach the U.S. Supreme. The controversial policy, initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), seeks to end the common practice used by employers to prevent employees from joining competitors or starting similar businesses within a certain time frame after leaving the company. Opponents of the FTC’s rule argue that noncompete agreements are crucial for protecting trade secrets and maintaining … Read more